Skip to main content
Report saying blacks speed more held up -- The Washington Times



The Justice Department has blocked the release of a study of suspected racial profiling after the survey concluded that black drivers speed more often than others.



The department had asked New Jersey officials to determine whether black speeders were being stopped more often as part of a racial-profiling investigation but has put the scheduled January release on hold, questioning how researchers reached their conclusions. ...



Federal officials wanted to know whether black and Hispanic drivers were being stopped for speeding at a higher rate than white motorists and whether appreciable differences between the groups could be attributed to a difference in driving behavior.



The unpublished study, according to sources familiar with its content, found that black motorists exceeded the speed limit more often than either whites or Hispanics. ....



In December 1999, state officials [New Jersey] entered into an agreement with the Justice Department to remedy the problem.



The Pacific Institute study, which used radar guns and high-speed photography to help identify the race of drivers and targeted only those who exceeded the speed limit by more than 15 miles per hour, was part of the state's response to the Justice Department agreement.



More than 38,500 drivers were evaluated, the sources said. Among the drivers specifically identified by race, the cameras more often caught black motorists speeding.
I love government surveys. This is the second suppressed report, though I agree that questions regarding methodology must be answered. Of course, the methodology of all surveys should be questioned; see below (or archives) regarding the spotted owl.



I no longer have the link to the other survey I'm thinking of. It had to do with distracted driving, specifically the use of cell phones while driving. Since it didn't demonstrate that using the phone while driving caused horrific numbers of accidents, the report wasn't issued, in fact was dismissed by the government agency that requested it. What did it show? That lookie-loos (rubberneckers) cause accidents 5x more than people using cell phones. That women putting on their make-up while driving were some 4x more likely to get in an accident than someone using a cell phone. That eating while driving was more often a factor. That changing the radio station was more likely to be a factor in an accident. Finally, 5th down the list, were cells phones. And since that didn't support the goal, the survey was dismissed. Ah, our government impartiality (this was during the Clinton years) in action....

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Not the Hero We Deserve, But the Hero We Need

The Dark Knight is the best film I’ve seen in years. Not just the best “superhero” film, but the best film of any type. It’s not perfect, not quite a masterpiece, but it’s flaws are, to me, tiny and overwhelmed by the time the film ends. While relatively bloodless, it is consistently brutal, not just in what it depicts but in the themes that drive it. TDK is a film for adults, please leave the kids at home. Let’s deal with those “flaws” first, the largest being the character Rachel Dawes . In Batman Begins , I blamed Katie Holmes . Her acting was weak, to say the least, which is regrettable in that who she is and what she says and does are important to the film. Critics agreed and either for that or other reasons, Katie was replaced by Maggie Gyllenhaal , who is a better actress. Yet here she’s weak, real weak. Maybe it’s the character, not the actress, which is frustrating because Rachel is a pivotal character. The film,...
1 comment
Read more

Dune Part 2 (2024)

I have come not to praise Dune but to bury it. I am in a distinct minority. So be it. To explain why, there will be some minor spoilers ahead; sorry. The short version is #NotMyDune. Summary: Picking up where Dune Part 1 left off, we find the young Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet) hanging out with the Fremen. Plots to overthrow rival houses and empires ensue. Go here to see what I thought about Dune Part 1 (2021) . Overall, I found it to be technically brilliant, but lacking a human heart, an exercise in frenetic slow motion. D2 is more of the same, though with far more action. Acting-wise, everyone is doing a fine, more than adequate job. Absolutely no one or nothing stands out. The way the characters are written (adapted, actually), their back and forths and interactions, are all weak and unengaging. I generally hate when they speak. I've read the novel a ridiculous number of times, and these films are prompting me to read it again. I understand that trying to translate the n...
1 comment
Read more