Skip to main content
FoxNews: White Professors Say Black Universities Discriminate in Advancement



Fascinating. A case could be made that these lawsuits result from the convergence of several factors. Among them would be affirmative action, and what is oft referred to as our "hyperlitiguous" society (ie, we sue for everything). How so?



Affirmative action, at its core, was about racial discrimination. It was dressed up in pretty language about "balancing inequities" and "correcting social wrongs," but wade through all that and you find the very thing it was meant to correct, racism. Affirmative action sought to codify and allow picking one candidate over another simply on the basis of race. Isn't that the very definition of racial discrimination? Affirmative action merely said that some racial dicrimination was all right. "Some" was defined as the politically correct notion of the moment, which in general means "persons of color."



Now combine that notion with the belief that someone else is always to blame for the stumbles and falls we suffer throughout life. Classic examples abound. A lady puts a cup of hot coffee between her legs, drives away, spills it, and it's MacDonald's fault for selling her the coffee. A motorcyclist gets on his cycle, rides away, hangs a left, and dumps it because he didn't restract his sidestand, so it must be Kawasaki's fault, damn their hides! And today's mystery lawsuit? Lady gets chewed to death ("mauled" is too gentle a word in this case), the owners are found guilty of manslaughter and second degree murder, and the apartment building owner gets slapped with a civil lawsuit by the victim's life mate.



Huh?



Voila, reverse discrimination lawsuits abound. At least they have some merit. Read the article for some especially egregious examples. My personal favorite was the personnel manager who was seeking a new professor. 100 applications were received, none of them from blacks. She was ordered to try again. The one (1) black who applied got the job. Apparently his credentials weren't stellar (which would be a legit explanation for hiring him) because the college settled out of court.



Racism isn't right, isn't defensible, and shouldn't be tolerated, no matter who practises it. That's what all these lawsuits, at least it part, are about.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

Wow, it’s been over a year. What a way to get back to this blog because… Are the films of the MCU getting worse? It’s a serious question because the latest that I’ve seen, Thor: Love and Thunder and Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania , are strong arguments that the answer is “yes.” Summary: Ant-Man & Ant-Family get sucked into the quantum realm, where skullduggery is afoot. A load of crap ensues. I’m an Ant-Man fan. I loved the first film despite its flaws. It would have been wonderful to see what Edgar Wright may have wrought. It was clear, though, that replacement director Peyton Reed kept some of Wright’s ideas alive. The result was one of the MCU’s most intimate films, a straight-forward tale of a Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) desperate to remain in his daughter’s life while being “gifted” the life of a superhero. Ant-Man and the Wasp sorta stayed that course, but naturally, because this is the modern MCU, we had to have a female superhero take over, the titular Wasp (Hope van Dyne,

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that

Rogan

The entire Joe Rogan controversy is an example of the kids being left in charge and the adults refusing to teach them any better. I’m not a regular consumer of podcasts. There are a couple I listen to from time to time, but nothing on a regular basis. While I’ve caught a few minutes of the Joe Rogan Experience on YouTube, I’ve never listened to his podcast. One of the primary reasons for that is that you have to subscribe to Spotify to do so, and I prefer Qobuz, Tidal, or even Amazon Music. Rogan is behind Spotify’s paywall and that’s that. But the nature of the fight is about more than who does or does not listen to Rogan. This fight goes to the very nature of the First Amendment and the fundamental concept of the United States. And yes, I understand that cuts both ways. What’s his name and Joni Mitchell are free to yank their creations from Spotify, no ifs, ands, or buts. I’m not denying their right, I’m questioning their reasons. Rogan talks to people. He does so largely unfiltered.