Skip to main content
Some hysterically accurate cartoons:



Right to DRIVE!



I remember the San Francisco Muni Metro. It was supposed to be the answer to all traffic congestion in downtown SF, all of Market Street from Van Ness to the Bay. Have you see the traffic on Market from Van Ness to the Bay?



So, what happened? Oh, a variety of things, but most of all -- it seems to me -- The City couldn't stick with the original plan. Thus, what was sold to the citizens isn't what they got. What was sold was an underground "metro" system that sat above the BART subway, and was built at the same time. (Both were built via the trench system. That is, they dug up Market Street and went to work, closing the street back up when they were done. It was, to put it mildly, a mess, but my Grandfather -- a civil engineer from Ohio -- BS'd his way into a tour and was happy.)



The design called for sidewalks along Market to be widened to allow improved pedestrian flow. Market was, at the time, six lanes wide, three in either direction, with the center two being shared as rail lines for the existing Muni railway. The plan was that the above ground Muni system, would vanish, at least from Van Ness on down.



(Actually, the K, M, and L lines would go underground on the other side o' the mountains, while the J and N lines would vanish as they approached Market. If you've got a map, the first three go under Twin Peaks and end up in the avenues, Sunset District, etc. The J runs on Church, and the N on Judah. Or at least did; I haven't kept completely up to date and there are new "lines" in operation.)



Anyway, from Van Ness on not only would the Muni railway be underground (the new Metro system), but there would be no surface buses either. Muni would cease to function on Market. Routes that formerly ran on Market would either cease to be, or be shifted one block over to Mission Street (which, at this point, runs parallel to Market). Passengers would be encouraged to transfer from surface buses to the Muni Metro at the Van Ness Station, a large complex just set up for the flow. Either that or further up at Castro Station (featured in "48 Hours," don't you know). Market, from Van Ness on down, would be for passenger cars or delivery trucks. Large cut outs in the brick sidewalks would allow for parking for delivery vehicles; there would be no parking on Market for civilian cars.



Sounded nice. The Metro was built with this in mind. The sidewalks were widened with this in mind. The city changed its mind.



Now Market is only four lanes wide, two in either direction. The sidewalks are huge, brick affairs. The two center lanes are still dominated by surface rail traffic, because while the Metro is now in full swing, The City decided it loved its aboveground rail service, to. Market is now a traffic nightmare that makes any previous tie-ups seem pale by comparison.



Ah, progress, thy name isn't San Francisco, "my City by the Bay...."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Not the Hero We Deserve, But the Hero We Need

The Dark Knight is the best film I’ve seen in years. Not just the best “superhero” film, but the best film of any type. It’s not perfect, not quite a masterpiece, but it’s flaws are, to me, tiny and overwhelmed by the time the film ends. While relatively bloodless, it is consistently brutal, not just in what it depicts but in the themes that drive it. TDK is a film for adults, please leave the kids at home. Let’s deal with those “flaws” first, the largest being the character Rachel Dawes . In Batman Begins , I blamed Katie Holmes . Her acting was weak, to say the least, which is regrettable in that who she is and what she says and does are important to the film. Critics agreed and either for that or other reasons, Katie was replaced by Maggie Gyllenhaal , who is a better actress. Yet here she’s weak, real weak. Maybe it’s the character, not the actress, which is frustrating because Rachel is a pivotal character. The film,...
1 comment
Read more

Dune Part 2 (2024)

I have come not to praise Dune but to bury it. I am in a distinct minority. So be it. To explain why, there will be some minor spoilers ahead; sorry. The short version is #NotMyDune. Summary: Picking up where Dune Part 1 left off, we find the young Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet) hanging out with the Fremen. Plots to overthrow rival houses and empires ensue. Go here to see what I thought about Dune Part 1 (2021) . Overall, I found it to be technically brilliant, but lacking a human heart, an exercise in frenetic slow motion. D2 is more of the same, though with far more action. Acting-wise, everyone is doing a fine, more than adequate job. Absolutely no one or nothing stands out. The way the characters are written (adapted, actually), their back and forths and interactions, are all weak and unengaging. I generally hate when they speak. I've read the novel a ridiculous number of times, and these films are prompting me to read it again. I understand that trying to translate the n...
1 comment
Read more