Skip to main content
Child abuse, as in abusive use of children:



Little lobbyists to protest at Capitol



Hundreds of Bay Area kids will be heading up to Sacramento this morning for a field trip on democracy -- with their first lesson being how to lobby.



Classes from San Francisco, Oakland and Berkeley -- some with students as young as 10 -- are being bused to the state Capitol to protest the education spending cuts recently announced by Gov. Gray Davis.



As of last count, nearly 300 San Francisco students ranging from the fourth to 12th grades were scheduled for the "field trip." Over in Oakland, at least 19 busloads will be taking more than 500 kids -- plus 450 adults.



All courtesy the state teacher, education and service employee unions -- with a helping hand from the local school districts themselves.



Just to make sure the trip has an "educational" component, Oakland school officials insisted that their kids first write an essay explaining why they wanted to go.
I am so sick and tired of every other political campaign ending with (or containing an element of) "for the children."



Leave the little tykes alone, for God's sake!



And this is just plain stupid, given that Davis actually increased educational spending. (In the article, a spokesman for the guv says Davis increased spending on education by 37% and is now taking back 3%, leaving that net increase of 34%.) Then again, the California Teachers Association has a long-running string of ads demanding higher pay for teachers, smaller classrooms, increased spending across the board, etc., "because everything child deserves a chance to succeed, and no child succeeds alone."



Arf!



I'm a product of a San Francisco education, with 10th through 12th coming from a public high school (Mission High survivor, boo-rah). One of the most telling moments was the validictorian for the Class of '74 (not mine), telling everyone to go out and demand their fair share from the government. The government, you see, owes everyone a living; you don't have to earn it yourself.



The research regarding smaller class sizes is questionable and subject to much dispute. Teacher salaries in my little neck of the woods seems awfully good. As regards education, the last thing on God's green earth that I want is CTA union input into what should be taught (something the CTA ads also demand). If it were one of my kids going to Sac on this trip, their sign and message would be, er, different.



Of course, that wouldn't be allowed. Free speech, in this regard, only goes so far. Or so it seems.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that ...

Not the Hero We Deserve, But the Hero We Need

The Dark Knight is the best film I’ve seen in years. Not just the best “superhero” film, but the best film of any type. It’s not perfect, not quite a masterpiece, but it’s flaws are, to me, tiny and overwhelmed by the time the film ends. While relatively bloodless, it is consistently brutal, not just in what it depicts but in the themes that drive it. TDK is a film for adults, please leave the kids at home. Let’s deal with those “flaws” first, the largest being the character Rachel Dawes . In Batman Begins , I blamed Katie Holmes . Her acting was weak, to say the least, which is regrettable in that who she is and what she says and does are important to the film. Critics agreed and either for that or other reasons, Katie was replaced by Maggie Gyllenhaal , who is a better actress. Yet here she’s weak, real weak. Maybe it’s the character, not the actress, which is frustrating because Rachel is a pivotal character. The film,...

Dune Part 2 (2024)

I have come not to praise Dune but to bury it. I am in a distinct minority. So be it. To explain why, there will be some minor spoilers ahead; sorry. The short version is #NotMyDune. Summary: Picking up where Dune Part 1 left off, we find the young Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet) hanging out with the Fremen. Plots to overthrow rival houses and empires ensue. Go here to see what I thought about Dune Part 1 (2021) . Overall, I found it to be technically brilliant, but lacking a human heart, an exercise in frenetic slow motion. D2 is more of the same, though with far more action. Acting-wise, everyone is doing a fine, more than adequate job. Absolutely no one or nothing stands out. The way the characters are written (adapted, actually), their back and forths and interactions, are all weak and unengaging. I generally hate when they speak. I've read the novel a ridiculous number of times, and these films are prompting me to read it again. I understand that trying to translate the n...