Skip to main content
Did this Associated Press story make the news anywhere? OpinionJournal's Best of the Web had it!



Arafat Under Growing Pressure



JERUSALEM (AP) - In the aftermath of Israel's military offensive in the West Bank, Yasser Arafat is coming under growing pressure at home - not just from the United States and Israel - to clean up his Palestinian Authority.



In stormy meetings with the Palestinian leader in recent days, Cabinet ministers and senior activists in his Fatah movement made a host of demands: municipal elections within eight weeks, voting for a new parliament within six months, a crackdown on corruption and a trimming of the unwieldy security apparatus.



They warned that if the Palestinians don't put their house in order, they will become increasingly vulnerable to U.S. and Israeli dictates. "We must do reforms our way, not the American way,'' said Hussein al-Sheik, Fatah leader in the West Bank.



Yet Arafat remained unmoved.



During a Cabinet meeting last Friday, two days after Israel released him from 34 days of confinement at his West Bank headquarters, he held lengthy monologues about the U.S. attacks on Afghanistan and Israel's 1982 invasion of Lebanon to avoid responding to the reform demands, one of the participants said.



When ministers insisted he get back to the issue at hand, he angrily walked out of the room, sources said. Persuaded to return after a few minutes, he said now was not the time for major changes, but offered to form a committee to look into the complaints - a time-tested Arafat technique for stifling dissent.



Arafat has not commented in public on the reform issue. ...
Good grief, even members of his Cabinet see that Arafat is taking them down the road to perdition's flame. Maybe he really wants to be a martyr.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

Wow, it’s been over a year. What a way to get back to this blog because… Are the films of the MCU getting worse? It’s a serious question because the latest that I’ve seen, Thor: Love and Thunder and Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania , are strong arguments that the answer is “yes.” Summary: Ant-Man & Ant-Family get sucked into the quantum realm, where skullduggery is afoot. A load of crap ensues. I’m an Ant-Man fan. I loved the first film despite its flaws. It would have been wonderful to see what Edgar Wright may have wrought. It was clear, though, that replacement director Peyton Reed kept some of Wright’s ideas alive. The result was one of the MCU’s most intimate films, a straight-forward tale of a Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) desperate to remain in his daughter’s life while being “gifted” the life of a superhero. Ant-Man and the Wasp sorta stayed that course, but naturally, because this is the modern MCU, we had to have a female superhero take over, the titular Wasp (Hope van Dyne,

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that

Rogan

The entire Joe Rogan controversy is an example of the kids being left in charge and the adults refusing to teach them any better. I’m not a regular consumer of podcasts. There are a couple I listen to from time to time, but nothing on a regular basis. While I’ve caught a few minutes of the Joe Rogan Experience on YouTube, I’ve never listened to his podcast. One of the primary reasons for that is that you have to subscribe to Spotify to do so, and I prefer Qobuz, Tidal, or even Amazon Music. Rogan is behind Spotify’s paywall and that’s that. But the nature of the fight is about more than who does or does not listen to Rogan. This fight goes to the very nature of the First Amendment and the fundamental concept of the United States. And yes, I understand that cuts both ways. What’s his name and Joni Mitchell are free to yank their creations from Spotify, no ifs, ands, or buts. I’m not denying their right, I’m questioning their reasons. Rogan talks to people. He does so largely unfiltered.