Skip to main content

Ted Rall, Idiot at Large





The beauty of this country is that idiots are free to parade around in public and prove how silly they truly are. In this little piece, titled "American Jihad," Ted Rall continues this fine tradition. He is so full of it on so many levels, the mind boggles. Just a bit:



First came a U.S. 9th circuit Court of Appeals ruling on June 26th, overturning a California law that requires public schools to lead students in the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance-which includes the phrase "one nation, under God." This law is plainly inappropriate in a country that prides itself on free speech and free will. Forcing anyone to say anything, much less making children pledge loyalty, would be far more appropriate under a totalitarian dictatorship. This is America. My right to say my country sucks when I think it does is what truly makes America great.




Now, this lovely column was reportedly written in Sacramento, California, and if so, I'm wondering if Ted is in the same Sacramento, California, I'm in. Why? Because the law does not require students to participate in the pledge. Yes, the teacher is supposed to lead the pledge, but the students and -- and do -- opt out. They can stand (or sit) in silence. They don't have to say a word; they are not compelled to say a thing. In short, no cheery little atheist is required to acknowledge that she's "under God."



I'm also confused by this entire notion that the word "God" = Christian-only faith, as if there were only one Christian faith, ha! Tell that to a Baptist while he stands next to a Mormon. Oh, duck!



That Jews and Muslims also worship "God" seems to escape the sensibilities of Ted.



In other words, "under God" can and does encompasses a variety of religions, and therefore does not represent a state endorsement or establishment of any single religion.



I have to give Ted some latitude, though. He refers to 9/11/01 as "The Thing That Happened Last Fall." He is right in saying that the war on terrorism is looking more like a war on Islam, though it's focused on that fanatical brand that longs for that clash between Islam and the rest of the world, so that Islam can just go ahead and take over. It was this very quest that led to the Crusades, the history of which is trotted out in an attempt to illustrate Christian and Western attempts to suppress the faiths of the Middle East. Never mind the Ottoman Empire and the Islamic invasions of much of Europe, that's just, er, inconvenient.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that ...
Post a Comment
Read more

DVD: The Descent

While waiting for the fourth disk of season 4 of House to arrive, I watched The Descent . This movie has been out on DVD for a while, so why bring it up now? Because I think I might become a fan of its writer-director, Neil Marshall . His latest is Doomsday , recently released on DVD, and while it’s sort of a mess, it’s a mess in that oh-fun-what-the-heck-let’s-shoot-a-Bentley-through-a-bus sort of way. The Descent is a different sort of animal. Prepare for spoilers. Since this film has been out for a while, I’m going to feel free to reveal. The setup is simple: Six friends go spelunking, complications ensue. Basic complications involve Sarah and Juno. Sarah is an emotional wreck following the rather horrible and tragic deaths of her husband and daughter (this trip is seen as therapy , oh my). Juno is a reckless thrill-seeker who leads an unknowing Sarah and friends into a cave no one has – publicly, at least – ever explored. All goes horribly...
1 comment
Read more

Dune Part 2 (2024)

I have come not to praise Dune but to bury it. I am in a distinct minority. So be it. To explain why, there will be some minor spoilers ahead; sorry. The short version is #NotMyDune. Summary: Picking up where Dune Part 1 left off, we find the young Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet) hanging out with the Fremen. Plots to overthrow rival houses and empires ensue. Go here to see what I thought about Dune Part 1 (2021) . Overall, I found it to be technically brilliant, but lacking a human heart, an exercise in frenetic slow motion. D2 is more of the same, though with far more action. Acting-wise, everyone is doing a fine, more than adequate job. Absolutely no one or nothing stands out. The way the characters are written (adapted, actually), their back and forths and interactions, are all weak and unengaging. I generally hate when they speak. I've read the novel a ridiculous number of times, and these films are prompting me to read it again. I understand that trying to translate the n...
1 comment
Read more