Skip to main content

Quick, to the neighbors!





Cable firms cracking down on Wi-Fi



Broadband providers are cracking down on popular Wi-Fi networks, threatening to cut service to customers who set up the inexpensive wireless systems and allow others to freely tap into their Internet access. Time Warner Cable of New York City has given 10 customers less than a week to stop using their accounts to provide a wireless local area network available to anyone within 300 feet. The letters are just an initial volley; Time Warner expects to send additional letters, while AT&T Broadband also is preparing similar letters for some of its customers.



The crackdown is reminiscent of the cable industry’s attempts to target cable thieves in the 1980s, and it reflects the soaring popularity of wireless Net access. After being introduced just a couple years ago, so-called Wi-Fi "hot spots" that tap into cable or digital subscriber lines (DSL) are now in at least 15 million homes and offices.
Oh, this is annoying for the simple fact that I can see both sides.



First, though, I don't think the comparison to early "cable thieves" is valid, as cable companies had to pay licensing fees to content providers (i.e., movie studios and the like) for showing their product. So, someone who tapped into the system for free was not paying for right to see a given show and/or movie.



I subscribe to AT&T Broadband (joined when it was still Comcast @ Home). I'd have to dig out my original agreement, but I don't think it mentions "bandwidth reselling." In any event, I have three computers that tie into that connection via a router that handles IP addressse. Thus, my single connection splits into three. When AT&T took over, they made it clear (to me, at least) that doing this wasn't a problem, that my internal network was my concern.



They also made clear that they were doing "load balancing" by throttling back the maximum connection speed I could expect. Whereas before I might see a theoretical maximum of 3MBps, they were cutting that back to 1.5MBps. It didn't matter how many people were on my side of the pipe, that's all I was getting.



So if I have 50 people working on that 1.5MBit pipe, the only people impact are those 50 people. I'm not adding to the drain on the AT&T system as a whole. And, as a customer, I'm paying for that 1.5MBit pipeline.



Now, my friend is getting ready to go WiFi within his house. And I'm thinking of adding that to my existing system (one access point, coming up). Will we both be breaking some law, rule, regulation? If AT&T (and others) makes it a policy that their customers can't use a local WiFi network, doesn't this boil down to an attempt to stifle a growing industry?



Fun, eh.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dune Part 2 (2024)

I have come not to praise Dune but to bury it. I am in a distinct minority. So be it. To explain why, there will be some minor spoilers ahead; sorry. The short version is #NotMyDune. Summary: Picking up where Dune Part 1 left off, we find the young Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet) hanging out with the Fremen. Plots to overthrow rival houses and empires ensue. Go here to see what I thought about Dune Part 1 (2021) . Overall, I found it to be technically brilliant, but lacking a human heart, an exercise in frenetic slow motion. D2 is more of the same, though with far more action. Acting-wise, everyone is doing a fine, more than adequate job. Absolutely no one or nothing stands out. The way the characters are written (adapted, actually), their back and forths and interactions, are all weak and unengaging. I generally hate when they speak. I've read the novel a ridiculous number of times, and these films are prompting me to read it again. I understand that trying to translate the n...
1 comment
Read more

I (Briefly) Try a Mac

 I Bought a Mac. My first computer was an Atari 800, fully loaded with 48k of RAM. And I mean the original, beige model, not its low-slung, fancy successor. My friend went for an Apple IIe, which cost a relative fortune. Eventually, I’d step up to an Atari 1040ST, while he’d get a IIgs. And even more eventually, we both ended up with IBM PC compatibles. MSDOS was my friend, Unix an ally. It was with great reluctance that I transition from a command-line interface (CLI) to a Graphic User Interface (GUI), always on a PC platform and never a Mac. I never bought into the hype and never experienced all the horrid things that allegedly befell anyone using a PC. For me, they just worked. Yet here I am, these many decades later, typing this on a brand-new MacBook Air M4. How things change... Initially, there was little regret but a mounting list of frustrations. Adjusting to the keyboard isn’t too hard, it’s just a matter of experimentation. Learning how to scale the display wasn’t awful, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Have I mentioned I saw Monsters vs. Aliens?

It’s possible that Pixar is becoming a blight on the world of animation. Yes, they do some really great work ( The Incredibles , Ratatouille ), but they’ve also done some clunkers ( Cars , Wall-E ). Their greatest sin, though, is that they apparently radiate a variation of the Steve Jobs Reality Distortion Field, so that any other animated film – especially if done with CG – is automatically judged inferior. There is some justification to this, but you don’t see every live action film being compared to, say, the films of Ingmar Bergman (well, except by brooding people wearing dark glasses sitting in dim coffee shops smoking clove cigarettes discussing cinema, damn you ). In the traditional film world, it’s accepted that different artists turn out different products. In the animated world, everyone is supposed to match or surpass Pixar, or so it seems. Needless to say, that’s just a crock. Monsters vs Aliens is to your typical Pixar production as Spielberg is to Scorsese. And I h...
2 comments
Read more