Skip to main content

This is our opinion...maybe





Judge Stays Own 'Pledge' Ruling



A day after he shocked the nation by declaring the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional, a federal appeals court judge in San Francisco put his ruling on hold Thursday.
What, he's surprised by the typhoon he and the others created? I can see him now, mumbling to himself, "I'm not gonna take the heat alone. Let's get all 11 of us to vote! Why in God's (unconstitutional) name did I have to write that god(oops)damn opinion?!?"



I'm telling ya, this is one of the funnier political and judicial moments in US history.



Ron Barrier of American Atheists Incorporated in New York endorsed Wednesday's court ruling and said atheists are standing firm in the midst of the decision's criticism.



Barrier said the government needs to recognize that there are millions of Americans with no religious beliefs who still are patriots and citizens and taxpayers.
And many millions more who hold strong religious beliefs. Amazingly, all those in the Senate and in the House who in the past have cried "foul" whenever the notion of school prayer is brought up, are screaming against this decision. Hypocrits all.



Equally amusing is the reaction of Michael Newdow, the man who filed the original suit. His honest observation is that Congress is up in arms in order to garner votes, but then he makes himself look silly when he speaks about how listening to the Pledge "injured" his daughter. His second grade age daughter.



And it turns out he originally filed this suit in Florida four years ago.



Why can't he just admit he's using his daughter as leverage to get this thing into court? This crap about protecting his daughter from the ravages of religion is just nauseating.



He would be on firmer, better ground just quoting Eisenhower when he signed the bill that inserted "under God" into the Pledge, in 1954.



In this way we are reaffirming the transcendence of religious faith in America's heritage and future.




The question is whether "under God" imposes a specific faith. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof[.]" What faith is invoked by the use of the word "god"? I can think of several right off the top of my head.



It's all so amusing, really. I think many are genuinely surprised by the uproar. They literally hadn't a clue.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I (Briefly) Try a Mac

 I Bought a Mac. My first computer was an Atari 800, fully loaded with 48k of RAM. And I mean the original, beige model, not its low-slung, fancy successor. My friend went for an Apple IIe, which cost a relative fortune. Eventually, I’d step up to an Atari 1040ST, while he’d get a IIgs. And even more eventually, we both ended up with IBM PC compatibles. MSDOS was my friend, Unix an ally. It was with great reluctance that I transition from a command-line interface (CLI) to a Graphic User Interface (GUI), always on a PC platform and never a Mac. I never bought into the hype and never experienced all the horrid things that allegedly befell anyone using a PC. For me, they just worked. Yet here I am, these many decades later, typing this on a brand-new MacBook Air M4. How things change... Initially, there was little regret but a mounting list of frustrations. Adjusting to the keyboard isn’t too hard, it’s just a matter of experimentation. Learning how to scale the display wasn’t awful, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dune Part 2 (2024)

I have come not to praise Dune but to bury it. I am in a distinct minority. So be it. To explain why, there will be some minor spoilers ahead; sorry. The short version is #NotMyDune. Summary: Picking up where Dune Part 1 left off, we find the young Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet) hanging out with the Fremen. Plots to overthrow rival houses and empires ensue. Go here to see what I thought about Dune Part 1 (2021) . Overall, I found it to be technically brilliant, but lacking a human heart, an exercise in frenetic slow motion. D2 is more of the same, though with far more action. Acting-wise, everyone is doing a fine, more than adequate job. Absolutely no one or nothing stands out. The way the characters are written (adapted, actually), their back and forths and interactions, are all weak and unengaging. I generally hate when they speak. I've read the novel a ridiculous number of times, and these films are prompting me to read it again. I understand that trying to translate the n...
1 comment
Read more

Rogan

The entire Joe Rogan controversy is an example of the kids being left in charge and the adults refusing to teach them any better. I’m not a regular consumer of podcasts. There are a couple I listen to from time to time, but nothing on a regular basis. While I’ve caught a few minutes of the Joe Rogan Experience on YouTube, I’ve never listened to his podcast. One of the primary reasons for that is that you have to subscribe to Spotify to do so, and I prefer Qobuz, Tidal, or even Amazon Music. Rogan is behind Spotify’s paywall and that’s that. But the nature of the fight is about more than who does or does not listen to Rogan. This fight goes to the very nature of the First Amendment and the fundamental concept of the United States. And yes, I understand that cuts both ways. What’s his name and Joni Mitchell are free to yank their creations from Spotify, no ifs, ands, or buts. I’m not denying their right, I’m questioning their reasons. Rogan talks to people. He does so largely unfiltered....
Post a Comment
Read more