Skip to main content

Empires Fall, the latest chapter





Microsoft won’t back Sun product



Just before closing arguments in its antitrust case, Microsoft delivered a broadside to one of its bitter software rivals, declaring Tuesday it will stop supporting Sun Microsystems' flagship product by 2004.



Microsoft cited Sun's opposition in the case as the reason for the decision to remove support for Sun’s Java programming language from future versions of Microsoft's Windows operating system. (MSNBC is a Microsoft-NBC joint venture.)



"The decision to remove Microsoft's Java implementation was made because of Sun’s strategy of using the legal system to compete with Microsoft," Microsoft spokesman Jim Cullinan said in a statement.



A Sun spokeswoman did not immediately return calls seeking comment.
For a company that is so all-fired concerned about its customers, to the point of bolting other applications into its operating system for "customer convinience" -- and, coincidentally, competition elimination -- this is a strange stance. (Not that I'd cry if Java and Active-X both went bye-bye.)



Several witnesses appearing in the states' case against Microsoft, including executives of computer maker Gateway, accused the software giant of retaliating against companies that refused Microsoft edicts or helped the government build its antitrust case.
And, voila, here they do it in public, admitting that retaliation is part of the reason for this decision. Madmen are in charge of the company.



A federal court found that Microsoft created programming tools that fooled Java programmers into thinking they were writing software that would work on any version of Java, rather than just Microsoft’s version. Microsoft still disputes that anyone was tricked into writing incompatible software.
And this was one of the actions taken against Microsoft that was open and shut. They attempted to co-opt a competitor's product and make it uniquely their own, then denied it. Now caught, they're just going to pretend the product doesn't exist and that none of their customers use it. They're concern is...touching.



"The settlement agreement between the companies prevents Microsoft from making any changes -- including any security fixes -- to our Java implementation after January 1, 2004," Cullinan said. "We will not put our customers or Windows at risk so you can anticipate that there will be no Java in Windows from that point forward."
Yet somehow others are able to put Java to work without attempting to steal it from Sun. Obviously Microsoft likes this entire notion of intellectual property theft, from MS-DOS v1.0 on.



Ah well, life goes on. Macintosh looks more attractive each day, though I'd still like to tinker with a Linux box. A Mac would still leave me stuck with M$ software, while a Linux box would probably require more hobby time than I'm able to devote at this time.



HOWEVER, I am tremendously excited to see what sort of product and company knocks M$ into the dirt. It's out there, just wait and see.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

Wow, it’s been over a year. What a way to get back to this blog because… Are the films of the MCU getting worse? It’s a serious question because the latest that I’ve seen, Thor: Love and Thunder and Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania , are strong arguments that the answer is “yes.” Summary: Ant-Man & Ant-Family get sucked into the quantum realm, where skullduggery is afoot. A load of crap ensues. I’m an Ant-Man fan. I loved the first film despite its flaws. It would have been wonderful to see what Edgar Wright may have wrought. It was clear, though, that replacement director Peyton Reed kept some of Wright’s ideas alive. The result was one of the MCU’s most intimate films, a straight-forward tale of a Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) desperate to remain in his daughter’s life while being “gifted” the life of a superhero. Ant-Man and the Wasp sorta stayed that course, but naturally, because this is the modern MCU, we had to have a female superhero take over, the titular Wasp (Hope van Dyne,
Post a Comment
Read more

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that
Post a Comment
Read more

Rogan

The entire Joe Rogan controversy is an example of the kids being left in charge and the adults refusing to teach them any better. I’m not a regular consumer of podcasts. There are a couple I listen to from time to time, but nothing on a regular basis. While I’ve caught a few minutes of the Joe Rogan Experience on YouTube, I’ve never listened to his podcast. One of the primary reasons for that is that you have to subscribe to Spotify to do so, and I prefer Qobuz, Tidal, or even Amazon Music. Rogan is behind Spotify’s paywall and that’s that. But the nature of the fight is about more than who does or does not listen to Rogan. This fight goes to the very nature of the First Amendment and the fundamental concept of the United States. And yes, I understand that cuts both ways. What’s his name and Joni Mitchell are free to yank their creations from Spotify, no ifs, ands, or buts. I’m not denying their right, I’m questioning their reasons. Rogan talks to people. He does so largely unfiltered.
Post a Comment
Read more