Skip to main content

Empires Fall, the latest chapter





Microsoft won’t back Sun product



Just before closing arguments in its antitrust case, Microsoft delivered a broadside to one of its bitter software rivals, declaring Tuesday it will stop supporting Sun Microsystems' flagship product by 2004.



Microsoft cited Sun's opposition in the case as the reason for the decision to remove support for Sun’s Java programming language from future versions of Microsoft's Windows operating system. (MSNBC is a Microsoft-NBC joint venture.)



"The decision to remove Microsoft's Java implementation was made because of Sun’s strategy of using the legal system to compete with Microsoft," Microsoft spokesman Jim Cullinan said in a statement.



A Sun spokeswoman did not immediately return calls seeking comment.
For a company that is so all-fired concerned about its customers, to the point of bolting other applications into its operating system for "customer convinience" -- and, coincidentally, competition elimination -- this is a strange stance. (Not that I'd cry if Java and Active-X both went bye-bye.)



Several witnesses appearing in the states' case against Microsoft, including executives of computer maker Gateway, accused the software giant of retaliating against companies that refused Microsoft edicts or helped the government build its antitrust case.
And, voila, here they do it in public, admitting that retaliation is part of the reason for this decision. Madmen are in charge of the company.



A federal court found that Microsoft created programming tools that fooled Java programmers into thinking they were writing software that would work on any version of Java, rather than just Microsoft’s version. Microsoft still disputes that anyone was tricked into writing incompatible software.
And this was one of the actions taken against Microsoft that was open and shut. They attempted to co-opt a competitor's product and make it uniquely their own, then denied it. Now caught, they're just going to pretend the product doesn't exist and that none of their customers use it. They're concern is...touching.



"The settlement agreement between the companies prevents Microsoft from making any changes -- including any security fixes -- to our Java implementation after January 1, 2004," Cullinan said. "We will not put our customers or Windows at risk so you can anticipate that there will be no Java in Windows from that point forward."
Yet somehow others are able to put Java to work without attempting to steal it from Sun. Obviously Microsoft likes this entire notion of intellectual property theft, from MS-DOS v1.0 on.



Ah well, life goes on. Macintosh looks more attractive each day, though I'd still like to tinker with a Linux box. A Mac would still leave me stuck with M$ software, while a Linux box would probably require more hobby time than I'm able to devote at this time.



HOWEVER, I am tremendously excited to see what sort of product and company knocks M$ into the dirt. It's out there, just wait and see.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I (Briefly) Try a Mac

 I Bought a Mac. My first computer was an Atari 800, fully loaded with 48k of RAM. And I mean the original, beige model, not its low-slung, fancy successor. My friend went for an Apple IIe, which cost a relative fortune. Eventually, I’d step up to an Atari 1040ST, while he’d get a IIgs. And even more eventually, we both ended up with IBM PC compatibles. MSDOS was my friend, Unix an ally. It was with great reluctance that I transition from a command-line interface (CLI) to a Graphic User Interface (GUI), always on a PC platform and never a Mac. I never bought into the hype and never experienced all the horrid things that allegedly befell anyone using a PC. For me, they just worked. Yet here I am, these many decades later, typing this on a brand-new MacBook Air M4. How things change... Initially, there was little regret but a mounting list of frustrations. Adjusting to the keyboard isn’t too hard, it’s just a matter of experimentation. Learning how to scale the display wasn’t awful, ...

Dune Part 2 (2024)

I have come not to praise Dune but to bury it. I am in a distinct minority. So be it. To explain why, there will be some minor spoilers ahead; sorry. The short version is #NotMyDune. Summary: Picking up where Dune Part 1 left off, we find the young Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet) hanging out with the Fremen. Plots to overthrow rival houses and empires ensue. Go here to see what I thought about Dune Part 1 (2021) . Overall, I found it to be technically brilliant, but lacking a human heart, an exercise in frenetic slow motion. D2 is more of the same, though with far more action. Acting-wise, everyone is doing a fine, more than adequate job. Absolutely no one or nothing stands out. The way the characters are written (adapted, actually), their back and forths and interactions, are all weak and unengaging. I generally hate when they speak. I've read the novel a ridiculous number of times, and these films are prompting me to read it again. I understand that trying to translate the n...

Rogan

The entire Joe Rogan controversy is an example of the kids being left in charge and the adults refusing to teach them any better. I’m not a regular consumer of podcasts. There are a couple I listen to from time to time, but nothing on a regular basis. While I’ve caught a few minutes of the Joe Rogan Experience on YouTube, I’ve never listened to his podcast. One of the primary reasons for that is that you have to subscribe to Spotify to do so, and I prefer Qobuz, Tidal, or even Amazon Music. Rogan is behind Spotify’s paywall and that’s that. But the nature of the fight is about more than who does or does not listen to Rogan. This fight goes to the very nature of the First Amendment and the fundamental concept of the United States. And yes, I understand that cuts both ways. What’s his name and Joni Mitchell are free to yank their creations from Spotify, no ifs, ands, or buts. I’m not denying their right, I’m questioning their reasons. Rogan talks to people. He does so largely unfiltered....