Skip to main content

Almost completely wrong





Why Conservatives Should Oppose the Death Penalty



So if the government should not have the power to prevent you from adding a room to your landmark house, why should it have the power to kill your neighbor? Without addressing the morality of capital punishment, is it not utterly contradictory for a conservative to espouse a government of limited power, but one that can also kill Americans?
Because almost everyone would agree that defense is The One area where they want to see government in action. This argument is silly on its face, because the opposition to "big government" does not translate as an opposition to government, which is where the author's argument would appear to lead.



Worse, out is trotted the standard line that innocent people have not only been sentenced to death, they've actually been executed. How many? The author states that between 1905 and 1987, twenty. Or, to actually quote, the assertion of one study is that "at least 20 innocent people had been put to death since 1905." The study was published in 1987.



I think it's fair to say that a great many more people have been murdered. I believe a case could be made that a far greater number if killers have never been caught, let alone faced any punishment. But that's neither here nor there, because the real question to be asked is how many more people die because a convicted killer is allowed to live?



My favorite case remains Arthur Shawcross of New York State. He was convicted of kidnapping, raping, and killing two young children (early teens, one boy, one girl) and sentenced to 25 to life, NY State not having the death penalty at the time. After service 12 years of that sentence, he was released on parole. Some time after that, he was arrested again, this time for the murder of at least 11 prostitutes in upper NY State. "At least" because they suspect there were more, but only found 11 bodies.



He was sentenced to 250 years. A summary of Shawcross and such can be found here.



Keeping this one murderer alive cost 11 women their lives. An interesting research project would be to calculate how many other such stories there have been since 1905.



And those are the cold numbers (the cold equations, as Tom Godwin put it). They're not the way to determine the validity of the death penalty, but they are certainly a start.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

Wow, it’s been over a year. What a way to get back to this blog because… Are the films of the MCU getting worse? It’s a serious question because the latest that I’ve seen, Thor: Love and Thunder and Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania , are strong arguments that the answer is “yes.” Summary: Ant-Man & Ant-Family get sucked into the quantum realm, where skullduggery is afoot. A load of crap ensues. I’m an Ant-Man fan. I loved the first film despite its flaws. It would have been wonderful to see what Edgar Wright may have wrought. It was clear, though, that replacement director Peyton Reed kept some of Wright’s ideas alive. The result was one of the MCU’s most intimate films, a straight-forward tale of a Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) desperate to remain in his daughter’s life while being “gifted” the life of a superhero. Ant-Man and the Wasp sorta stayed that course, but naturally, because this is the modern MCU, we had to have a female superhero take over, the titular Wasp (Hope van Dyne,
Post a Comment
Read more

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that
Post a Comment
Read more

Rogan

The entire Joe Rogan controversy is an example of the kids being left in charge and the adults refusing to teach them any better. I’m not a regular consumer of podcasts. There are a couple I listen to from time to time, but nothing on a regular basis. While I’ve caught a few minutes of the Joe Rogan Experience on YouTube, I’ve never listened to his podcast. One of the primary reasons for that is that you have to subscribe to Spotify to do so, and I prefer Qobuz, Tidal, or even Amazon Music. Rogan is behind Spotify’s paywall and that’s that. But the nature of the fight is about more than who does or does not listen to Rogan. This fight goes to the very nature of the First Amendment and the fundamental concept of the United States. And yes, I understand that cuts both ways. What’s his name and Joni Mitchell are free to yank their creations from Spotify, no ifs, ands, or buts. I’m not denying their right, I’m questioning their reasons. Rogan talks to people. He does so largely unfiltered.
Post a Comment
Read more