Skip to main content

What Do Stars Do? They Shine!

I didn't know who Matthew Vaughn was until I saw Layer Cake. Even then the name didn't mean much. I eventually found out he was involved in the production of both Lock, Stock and Two Smokin' Barrels and Snatch. I've yet to see Snatch, but I did see Smokin' Barrels. And why am I bringing up all these Brit semi-gangster films?

Because while I enjoyed Barrels, I found Layer Cake to be exceptional. It is one of those rare films that once I start watching I can't stop until the end credits roll. It is an excellent film, with any number of things going on, all of which pay off at the end. Beautifully crafted, well acted, on and on. But I gush and what does this have to do with stars?

Not stars as in film stars, but stars as in bright balls of gas burning brightly billions of miles away. Stars as in shooting stars. Stars as in Stardust, Matthew Vaughn's insufficiently heralded film from the ancient days of 2007. Whoever was in charge of publicity needs to be taken out and beaten. Seriously. Criminal charges would be appropriate.

My daughter had managed to see Stardust in the theater and said that if for no other reason, I should see it because Robert De Niro is in it and wears a corset. My curiosity piqued, I waited for the DVD. Eventually it rose within the ranks of my Netflix queue. That wasn't enough. Now I own a copy of the DVD. Films this good should be supported and I try and do my bit.

Is Stardust perfect? No, but it is superb in precisely the ways that Pirates of the Caribbean 3 isn't. That is: Everyone can act, everyone has a motive, everyone interacts with everyone else in believable ways. Further, the magic is omnipresent yet strangely restrained, as well as being logical and consistent. CGI enhances scenes rather than dominates them. Most glorious of all, the villain has a clearly stated motive. And if that's not enough, it has an adult sense of humor about everything. The author of the graphic novel, Neil Gaiman, states in one of the DVD's extras that he wanted to create an adult fairy tale. Well, having never read it, I can't judge the novel but Vaughn succeeds in creating just that on the big screen (or even your TV screen).

Given all that, wherein does Stardust fail, or fall short? Well, I'm not much of a Claire Danes fan, though it's more a lack of appeal than some deliberate offense. Here, as said, she acts well and is adequate, but I would have expected more from a fallen star. Ditto Charlie Cox, the romantic lead, and why on earth does Sienna Miller keep popping up on screen? None of them causes offense, they're mostly just...(yawn).

The film sometimes treads dangerously close to relying a bit too much on coincidence to propel the plot. Also the aforementioned scene with De Niro seems to serve no purpose other than to firmly establish that his Captain Shakespeare is gay. Doesn't that stereotype get tired?

But by film's end all of that became forgotten because whatever flaws in the writing or acting or anything else, Vaughn's directing is superb. He juggles all sorts of bits and pieces into a whole that at the end comes together with simple beauty. Really. He ties up disparate storylines with an ease that should embarrass other directors. And while the climax is deus ex machina in nature, you just feel wonder rather than disappointment.

Dirty Harry, over at Libertas, feels much the same way and says it so much better than I. The film, as he says, has heart. I'd add that as with films like Transformers and Hot Fuzz, it's clear that everyone working on this film was having a grand time and wanted to share their adventures with us. Any actor shortcomings, any failings in the writing, all vanish under the joy of their work and Vaughn's deft control and at the end I was laughing and crying in the sheer glory of a perfect happy ending.

If not quite worthy of four stars (maybe 3.99999), Stardust is nonetheless worthy of your time, and I am looking forward to Vaughn's next project, Thor.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Not the Hero We Deserve, But the Hero We Need

The Dark Knight is the best film I’ve seen in years. Not just the best “superhero” film, but the best film of any type. It’s not perfect, not quite a masterpiece, but it’s flaws are, to me, tiny and overwhelmed by the time the film ends. While relatively bloodless, it is consistently brutal, not just in what it depicts but in the themes that drive it. TDK is a film for adults, please leave the kids at home. Let’s deal with those “flaws” first, the largest being the character Rachel Dawes . In Batman Begins , I blamed Katie Holmes . Her acting was weak, to say the least, which is regrettable in that who she is and what she says and does are important to the film. Critics agreed and either for that or other reasons, Katie was replaced by Maggie Gyllenhaal , who is a better actress. Yet here she’s weak, real weak. Maybe it’s the character, not the actress, which is frustrating because Rachel is a pivotal character. The film,...
1 comment
Read more

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dune Part 2 (2024)

I have come not to praise Dune but to bury it. I am in a distinct minority. So be it. To explain why, there will be some minor spoilers ahead; sorry. The short version is #NotMyDune. Summary: Picking up where Dune Part 1 left off, we find the young Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet) hanging out with the Fremen. Plots to overthrow rival houses and empires ensue. Go here to see what I thought about Dune Part 1 (2021) . Overall, I found it to be technically brilliant, but lacking a human heart, an exercise in frenetic slow motion. D2 is more of the same, though with far more action. Acting-wise, everyone is doing a fine, more than adequate job. Absolutely no one or nothing stands out. The way the characters are written (adapted, actually), their back and forths and interactions, are all weak and unengaging. I generally hate when they speak. I've read the novel a ridiculous number of times, and these films are prompting me to read it again. I understand that trying to translate the n...
1 comment
Read more