Skip to main content

Of Mice and Text Editors

I'm always in search of the ideal word processor, or even a great text editor. So I was amused by an article in the the New York Times Magazine that was cursing Microsoft Word.  It, along with other posts and articles it referred to, was a rallying cry to abandon Word. Amusement became peals of laughter, however, when I realized that all of these articles were written by MacHeads. How they avoided choking on the irony is a mystery to me.

Why do I say this? Because the Mac drove the industry to its current GUI state. Menu here, fancy font there...on and on. Lovely for an operating system, I suppose, but loathsome for a text editor, for when you just want to do some writing. Which is why these articles were hilarious, because they were all written by MacHeads, complaining about the very state of things their beloved Mac created. Not that they thought of it in those terms. Instead, it was all Microsoft's fault.

Beyond the irony, I can sympathize with their plight. Early on in my forays into word processing I discovered that it's far too easy to change things when you use a computer, and so you do. Constantly. Endlessly. A tweak here, a touch there. Oh, maybe this word would look better before that word. Then there are the font choices. Ooh, Verdana looks marvelous, makes Arial look plain, and why do we have to suffer with Courier 12?!? (Once upon a time, I assisted in an on-line writing forum and more than a few participants complained about the font restrictions for manuscript submissions. You tried to explain that the entire industry was geared around Courier mono-spaced but they whined that it "looks ugly!" Strange, but I thought you wanted a reader to marvel over the substance of your words, not the style. But I digress...)

The end result of having access to all this fiddling is that you're doing anything but writing. Eventually, if you apply yourself, you can learn to avoid these tics. Maybe. They always lurk there, however, and they tease your inner editor into coming out to play at the worst time, when you're trying to crank out that all important first draft.

Thus, the search for the perfect creative writing word processor/text editor. To the delight of MacHeads, and to my utter damnation, the best ones appear to be MacOnly software.

Until a couple of years ago, I was content with WordPerfect. Setting a manuscript up was pretty straight forward and I'd been using it since pre-DOS days. When I was in law school, though, I reluctantly started using Word. My entire study group used it, including the guy with the Mac, and it just made it easier to exchange notes and the like. As a result, my writing took on the character of a split personality, with my creative writing being done in WP while scholastic and business work was done in Word. It was a situation that couldn't last, and it didn't. What ended it was MS Word 2007.

Most reviews of Word '07 focus on the elimination of the menus and the introduction of the "ribbon" interface. The learning curve is strange rather than steep, but once your mind clicks to the new lay of the land, it all seems clear, clean, and easy. Microsoft did a marvelous job, throwing out the old and trying to see how well something new new worked. I think it works great.

But what converted me completely was the ability to hide the ribbon. Double-click on a ribbon title and the entire thing goes away. Click next to the ruler and it goes away. In short order, Word appears sparse, bare, neat, clean, unobtrusive. It's almost like looking at the DOS version of WP. The status bar along the bottom of the window shows a real-time word count, plus other ancillary information. It's marvelous.

I spent a little time defining some writing styles, all mono-spaced Courier of course. I set the style, the ribbon goes away, and I'm left with a bare screen. If I maximize the window I can get rid of other desktop distractions and just get to work. Yet often that's not enough, and so I break out Q10.

Q10 is a text editor that makes your computer act like a typewriter. It even clicks as you type (though you can turn that off if you like). When working in Q10 you have a black screen with orange text. It takes over the entire screen, hiding the rest of your computer world away. Along the bottom is a sparse status bar that counts words, pages, and characters. It also shows the file name and the time of day. Other than that, it's just you and your words. You can't do anything fancy. You can't even underline, bold, or italicize.

I cannot stress how much of an effect this has on your writing. You focus on what you're writing and not how you're writing it. It's superb. And since Q10 saves ordinary ASCII text files, they're usable anywhere in the computer world. Once I've a first draft done, it's easy to move it into Word for formatting and letting the inner editor out to play.

Oh, and it's free.

There are, for those who are interested, equivalent programs for the Mac world. Still, though, I just find it ironic that MacHeads are looking for this stuff, distracted by all the hoopla their favored computer created. Too, too funny.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I (Briefly) Try a Mac

 I Bought a Mac. My first computer was an Atari 800, fully loaded with 48k of RAM. And I mean the original, beige model, not its low-slung, fancy successor. My friend went for an Apple IIe, which cost a relative fortune. Eventually, I’d step up to an Atari 1040ST, while he’d get a IIgs. And even more eventually, we both ended up with IBM PC compatibles. MSDOS was my friend, Unix an ally. It was with great reluctance that I transition from a command-line interface (CLI) to a Graphic User Interface (GUI), always on a PC platform and never a Mac. I never bought into the hype and never experienced all the horrid things that allegedly befell anyone using a PC. For me, they just worked. Yet here I am, these many decades later, typing this on a brand-new MacBook Air M4. How things change... Initially, there was little regret but a mounting list of frustrations. Adjusting to the keyboard isn’t too hard, it’s just a matter of experimentation. Learning how to scale the display wasn’t awful, ...

Dune Part 2 (2024)

I have come not to praise Dune but to bury it. I am in a distinct minority. So be it. To explain why, there will be some minor spoilers ahead; sorry. The short version is #NotMyDune. Summary: Picking up where Dune Part 1 left off, we find the young Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet) hanging out with the Fremen. Plots to overthrow rival houses and empires ensue. Go here to see what I thought about Dune Part 1 (2021) . Overall, I found it to be technically brilliant, but lacking a human heart, an exercise in frenetic slow motion. D2 is more of the same, though with far more action. Acting-wise, everyone is doing a fine, more than adequate job. Absolutely no one or nothing stands out. The way the characters are written (adapted, actually), their back and forths and interactions, are all weak and unengaging. I generally hate when they speak. I've read the novel a ridiculous number of times, and these films are prompting me to read it again. I understand that trying to translate the n...

Rogan

The entire Joe Rogan controversy is an example of the kids being left in charge and the adults refusing to teach them any better. I’m not a regular consumer of podcasts. There are a couple I listen to from time to time, but nothing on a regular basis. While I’ve caught a few minutes of the Joe Rogan Experience on YouTube, I’ve never listened to his podcast. One of the primary reasons for that is that you have to subscribe to Spotify to do so, and I prefer Qobuz, Tidal, or even Amazon Music. Rogan is behind Spotify’s paywall and that’s that. But the nature of the fight is about more than who does or does not listen to Rogan. This fight goes to the very nature of the First Amendment and the fundamental concept of the United States. And yes, I understand that cuts both ways. What’s his name and Joni Mitchell are free to yank their creations from Spotify, no ifs, ands, or buts. I’m not denying their right, I’m questioning their reasons. Rogan talks to people. He does so largely unfiltered....