Skip to main content

DVD: Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

Raiders of the Lost Ark, or, in long form, Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark, is arguably a perfect film. What it lacks in depth or intellect it more than makes up for in verve, style, and an extraordinary dedication to craft. Above all else, it rocks.

The next two sequels couldn't live up to the original. Temple of Doom decided that "dark" was a good thing. I enjoyed it at the time but it's aged horribly, with Steven Spielberg's wife-to-be being grating and annoying. Please, please, I now beg, just let her fall into the lava! Only that little Short Round bastard (!) is worse.

And while The Last Crusade recaptured a degree of the original's sense of fun, it obliterated two of its cherished characters. Marcus Brody was reduced to being a idiot while Sallah is depicted as hapless and well nigh useless. These were criminal abuses of people who were key to the first film, especially in the way they gave Indiana Jones, the man, background and depth.

And now we have Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, a film I first saw at the theatre but didn't want to talk about until I had seen it again, alas on DVD. It's a cut above Temple, kind of. It's a cut way below Crusade, definitely. It doesn't live up to the original, sorry.

Kingdom finds us re-entering the life of Indiana Jones in 1957. He's long since helped rid the world of Nazis and now he's just a college professor. Unfortunately for him, there's a new evil in the world, Communism, and they want something only Indy can help them find.

The "why" behind that is never particularly clear. In fact, why anyone does anything in this film is never clear. Nothing seems to flow. Instead, the plot just seems to stutter from one set piece to the next. The Commies seem perfectly capable of moving things along without the good Doctor Jones, and he has no reason for doing anything.

(Come to think of it, maybe Temple of Doom is better than Kingdom. Nah, Temple has Short Round...)

I'm worried about Spielberg. I think he's lost it. And I say that as someone who was 100% a fan. I will ardently defend pretty much everything he's made up until Munich, excepting The Lost World (the film is as morally bankrupt as Munich, but at least it has a T-rex in San Diego). He had me from "go" with Duel and I thought he owned me for life with Jaws, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and Raiders.

But now he's delivered this one-two sucker punch of Munich and Kingdom. Kingdom is incoherent on its own terms. It's first mistake was to forsake God in favor of aliens. The underlying spiritual quests of the first three films lend them a strong sense of good versus evil; this is completely lacking in Kingdom. It's second, related mistake was to forsake any notion of actually making the bad guys, you know, bad, firmly establishing why we do not want these particular people to get their hands on this particular power. When he was fighting Nazis it was easy to see who was good and who was evil, amplified by the underlying quest for God. In Kingdom, because of how modern Hollywood denies the villainy of the Soviet Union, you have to work harder to make them effective film villains.

The film even undercuts the entire idea of how "bad" the Communists are. The FBI agents are more sinister, more unforgiving. And Indy is suspended because of political pressure. His new boss actually whines about the "Red scare", dismissing it with a sniffle. This despite evidence that maybe it's not a "scare" because, duh, Soviet agents just raided a top secret US base on US soil.

Kingdom never recovers from these missteps right at the beginning. The reliance on CGI is tragic; all sense of thrill and danger is lost. Harrison Ford looks properly older and tired, and I thought he could pull it off, but after a while he just seems to be going through the motions. Same for Karen Allen, and I cheered when I read she was in the film. Alas, I was let down. Even John Williams' music was listless. And please, don't get me started on this film's "Short Round" character.

Bottom line: Waaay disappointing. Please, Steven, try and get back on track with your next film. Meanwhile, let Indy rest in peace. After all, we'll always have Egypt.

Comments

Unknown said…
Good review. You nail "Kingdom" for all the right reasons. A true disappointment, yet the fact that it made oodles of money means that message wasn't sent to Spielberg and co. I truly hope Steven's creative tank isn't on empty. Hollywood needs his films ... as do I.

And speaking of perfect films ... that's the way I describe "Jaws."
Toto said…
Last comment was from Toto ... not Julie. My wife signed on to my computer and her info was still on file!

Popular posts from this blog

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

Wow, it’s been over a year. What a way to get back to this blog because… Are the films of the MCU getting worse? It’s a serious question because the latest that I’ve seen, Thor: Love and Thunder and Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania , are strong arguments that the answer is “yes.” Summary: Ant-Man & Ant-Family get sucked into the quantum realm, where skullduggery is afoot. A load of crap ensues. I’m an Ant-Man fan. I loved the first film despite its flaws. It would have been wonderful to see what Edgar Wright may have wrought. It was clear, though, that replacement director Peyton Reed kept some of Wright’s ideas alive. The result was one of the MCU’s most intimate films, a straight-forward tale of a Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) desperate to remain in his daughter’s life while being “gifted” the life of a superhero. Ant-Man and the Wasp sorta stayed that course, but naturally, because this is the modern MCU, we had to have a female superhero take over, the titular Wasp (Hope van Dyne,

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that

Rogan

The entire Joe Rogan controversy is an example of the kids being left in charge and the adults refusing to teach them any better. I’m not a regular consumer of podcasts. There are a couple I listen to from time to time, but nothing on a regular basis. While I’ve caught a few minutes of the Joe Rogan Experience on YouTube, I’ve never listened to his podcast. One of the primary reasons for that is that you have to subscribe to Spotify to do so, and I prefer Qobuz, Tidal, or even Amazon Music. Rogan is behind Spotify’s paywall and that’s that. But the nature of the fight is about more than who does or does not listen to Rogan. This fight goes to the very nature of the First Amendment and the fundamental concept of the United States. And yes, I understand that cuts both ways. What’s his name and Joni Mitchell are free to yank their creations from Spotify, no ifs, ands, or buts. I’m not denying their right, I’m questioning their reasons. Rogan talks to people. He does so largely unfiltered.