Skip to main content

A bit of a wandering rant





So I read this little gem, which leads to Ted Rall's bit, which has little nuggets of truth that are just a pain to dig out from all the anti-Bush anti-American anti-West rhetoric. Eventually I end up on Warblogger Watch, which certainly provides plenty of evidence of Charles Kauthammer's clarification of the differences between how Conservatives view Liberals and vice versa. Namely: "Conservatives are mean, Liberals are stupid." Other posts over at The Watch illustrate and support Christ Weinkopf's list of "What Liberals Hate Most."



While scrolling through the Watch's postings (and wondering, "Well, who watches the watchers?"), I found this one which, in turn, has this little quote:



It's really not much of a democracy anymore, is it? Shouldn't we own up to the fact that the US is governed by an oligarchy? Such an admission would at least begin the process of clearing our political language of cant.
So, I had to make sure I understood what he was trying to say. Thus, the Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition, 2001, defines oligarchy as essentially a "ruling elite." Its definition also includes this interesting little note:



In practice, however, almost all governments, whatever their form, are run by a small minority of members. From this perspective, the major distinction between oligarchy and democracy is that in the latter, the elites compete with each other, gaining power by winning public support. The extent and type of barriers impeding those who attempt to join this ruling group is also significant.
Which all leads to something any mean Republican or Conservative can tell any stupid Democrat or Liberal:



We (as in the United States of America, for worldwide clarification) don't live in a Democracy; we live in a Republic.



Accepting the oligarch aspects of our government, it seems that it has been ever thus. Decades upon decades ago, when I was much younger, there were a given set of politicians in office. They're still there today. Ted Kennedy is still a US Senator. In the California scene, at least Willie Brown is no longer in the state assembly, but he's still in politics (as mayor of San Francisco, my home town). This pair always leap to mind for two reasons: 1) I was raised by Democratic parents, so we always paid attention to Democrats. 2) "Professional politician" is all their job resumes read.



I laugh my ass off every time someone points at [name a Conversative or Republican] and says he's never worked a day in his life, can't possibly understand the needs of "the working man," etc. etc. etc. As if any Liberal/Democrat is any different! Possibly worse, because they're certainly more subtle about shilling for Big Corporations. Just take a gander at the bills Hollins and Berman have presented on behalf (and at the behest) of the ever-more-monolithic media industry. (More complete coverage via previously mentioned article by Farhad Manjoo, Sour notes, or Dan Gillmor's Hacking, hijacking our rights.) They literally want to take control of your home computer, yet no squawks. Stock market takes a dump, though, and it's all because Bush is a pawn of Big Business. In fact, that's why we bombed Afghanistan! Blah blah blah.



Back in the early seventies, while I laughed at all the fools in their cages -- er, cars -- because my motorcycle got over 40 miles per gallon and I could fill the gas tank for less than a buck, there was this little matter going on called "Watergate." Yet, what got the bigger headlines and put people in a real uproar was the oil embargo and the rising price of gasoline (it soon took a buck and a half to fill my gas tank, damnit). Liberals -- at the time self-identified as "radicals" -- lamented that people were more concerned about the price of gas for their cars, than an assault on their freedom. (Why? Because the personal automobile is a tangible expression of that freedom. But that's another rant.)



The reverse seems true today, only it's clearly driven by ideology. There is opposition to what Bush v2 does simply because he's a Republican, and therefore must be mean. On the other hand, many of these same people ignore a Liberal, government-sponsored, direct assault on what has become the second great icon of personal freedom in our country, the personal computer (flavor of your choice).



They must be stupid.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Not the Hero We Deserve, But the Hero We Need

The Dark Knight is the best film I’ve seen in years. Not just the best “superhero” film, but the best film of any type. It’s not perfect, not quite a masterpiece, but it’s flaws are, to me, tiny and overwhelmed by the time the film ends. While relatively bloodless, it is consistently brutal, not just in what it depicts but in the themes that drive it. TDK is a film for adults, please leave the kids at home. Let’s deal with those “flaws” first, the largest being the character Rachel Dawes . In Batman Begins , I blamed Katie Holmes . Her acting was weak, to say the least, which is regrettable in that who she is and what she says and does are important to the film. Critics agreed and either for that or other reasons, Katie was replaced by Maggie Gyllenhaal , who is a better actress. Yet here she’s weak, real weak. Maybe it’s the character, not the actress, which is frustrating because Rachel is a pivotal character. The film,...
1 comment
Read more

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that ...
Post a Comment
Read more

We pause now for a minor rant…

“My car has a flat tire.” “You should buy a new car.” Every time I hear President Obama and other Democrats talking about “health care reform,” that’s what the conversation sounds like. A health care crisis is declared and the only solution is to replace the entire system. At most, around 15% of the American population is without health care insurance. Ignoring the fact that for most of them, this is a matter of choice, it also means that 85% are insured. And of that 85%, something like 70+% like their current coverage and don’t want the government to touch it. So for the vast majority, the current system works and works great. Yet, because of the minority for whom it allegedly does not...toss it all, start again. Admittedly, regardless of insurance coverage, it all costs too much, but again, the only accepted approach to controlling costs are to throw out everything and turn it all over to the government. Tactics that are proposed to address specific cost issues are not consid...
Post a Comment
Read more