Skip to main content

Maybe it’s time to leave California

Seriously.

I’m San Francisco born and bred, though I currently live in the Sacramento Valley. I’ve spent my entire life in California. I’ve visited hither and yon and have always returned to the Golden State.

I like it here. If you’re a motorcyclist, you’re never too far from a great riding road. If you like the sea, you’re never too far from the ocean, or some vast lake. If you like the mountains, well say hello to the Sierra Nevadas. If you like the desert, it’s right down there, and if you prefer gentle rolling hills, no problem.

Love cities? Fine, we can accommodate that, too. Bright lights, big city, welcome to this corner’s Starbucks, better than the next. And did I mention movie stars, glitz, and glamour? And politics? Oh, boy, do we have politics.

Which is the problem.

California politics aren’t just left-wing – and they’re not even extremely left-wing if you really look at them – they are insane. There is a complete sense of disconnect from reality. “Let us initiate this policy.” But we don’t have the money. “It is a nice policy, isn’t it wonderful.” How can we afford this? “This policy is wonderful.” The state is functionally bankrupt. “Yes, this policy is superb.”

The broadest range of tax increases in state history, possibly the largest ever seen in any state, has just been enacted. There is more to come. I’ve seen the bills, including the ones that didn’t pass. This time. It’s bad, it’s getting worse, the worst is yet to come.

This May will see a set of ballot measures, placed their by the Legislature, all dealing with the state budget. One of these measures is a token attempt at getting a grip on the state’s monetary swings. “Token” is a generous description, but it’s a state constitutional amendment and requires voter approval.

If the voters approve this, do you know what their reward will be? Several tax increases will remain in effect 1-2 years longer. For having the audacity of hinting that maybe there should be a vague notion of an idea of a meager spending cap – and it’s not even really that – we will get socked with higher taxes for more years.

Oh, jolly.

The sales tax is about to have another percentage point tacked on (it will exceed 8%; the national average is 5%). Vehicle registration fees are about to double (and California is already insanely out of sync with even neighboring states). Gas taxes are being left alone…so far, but the idea is still in play. Income taxes are going up, not just on the “wealthy,” the state’s favorite target, but across the board. Lottery revenue that was supposed to be for school’s will be able to be redirected to wherever they see fit. Tobacco tax revenue that was supposed to be for pre-school programs will be able to be redirected, as long as the redirect has some vague connection with kids.

As King says, “Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.”

Unemployment has risen to over 10% and shows no sign of slacking. California state revenue relies heavily on taxing the wealthy – you know, Obama’s favorite target – but they took a major hit when the stock market crashed. Guess what that did to state revenues? Oh, and they can just leave the state and forget the entire hassle, so off they go.

The nation’s economy isn’t all that great, but California’s is beginning to resemble that of a failed banana republic’s. What should terrify the rest of the country is that the precise formula that led to this mess in California is what Obama, Pelosi, Reid, et al, want to apply at the national level. Fun for all?

So maybe it’s time to consider another state. Though Washington is liberal, it is not insane, and Colorado is simply beautiful. Who knows about elsewhere. I’m sure there’s a budget office out there for me, I can watch movies anywhere, and all I need for writing is time and space.

Or maybe I’m feeling particularly depressed and letting cynicism get the better of me. For the moment.

So for now, I’ll go to a friend’s late Saint Patrick’s Day party, enjoy a black and tan or two, and continue to contemplate the whichness of why.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

Wow, it’s been over a year. What a way to get back to this blog because… Are the films of the MCU getting worse? It’s a serious question because the latest that I’ve seen, Thor: Love and Thunder and Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania , are strong arguments that the answer is “yes.” Summary: Ant-Man & Ant-Family get sucked into the quantum realm, where skullduggery is afoot. A load of crap ensues. I’m an Ant-Man fan. I loved the first film despite its flaws. It would have been wonderful to see what Edgar Wright may have wrought. It was clear, though, that replacement director Peyton Reed kept some of Wright’s ideas alive. The result was one of the MCU’s most intimate films, a straight-forward tale of a Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) desperate to remain in his daughter’s life while being “gifted” the life of a superhero. Ant-Man and the Wasp sorta stayed that course, but naturally, because this is the modern MCU, we had to have a female superhero take over, the titular Wasp (Hope van Dyne,

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that

Rogan

The entire Joe Rogan controversy is an example of the kids being left in charge and the adults refusing to teach them any better. I’m not a regular consumer of podcasts. There are a couple I listen to from time to time, but nothing on a regular basis. While I’ve caught a few minutes of the Joe Rogan Experience on YouTube, I’ve never listened to his podcast. One of the primary reasons for that is that you have to subscribe to Spotify to do so, and I prefer Qobuz, Tidal, or even Amazon Music. Rogan is behind Spotify’s paywall and that’s that. But the nature of the fight is about more than who does or does not listen to Rogan. This fight goes to the very nature of the First Amendment and the fundamental concept of the United States. And yes, I understand that cuts both ways. What’s his name and Joni Mitchell are free to yank their creations from Spotify, no ifs, ands, or buts. I’m not denying their right, I’m questioning their reasons. Rogan talks to people. He does so largely unfiltered.