Skip to main content

Catching up...

Before I forget, again, belated:

Happy Hanukkah!

Merry Christmas!

Happy New Year!

I haven't seen many films lately, going to see only one at the theatre. Someone else paid, so I ended up seeing The Tale of Despereaux, drawn to the flame by my love of animation.

Animation has different styles, just as different directors bring a distinct style to their works. This is oft-times strange in animation because they are such collaborative processes. Nonetheless, everyone can recognize a Disney cartoon from a Warner's. In the modern world, Pixar films have a familiar sheen to them, distinct from what Dreamworks is cranking out, etc.

Despereaux is unique and, to my eyes, beautiful. It feels lush, rich, and alive. I can't say enough good things about the artistry and craft that went into the look, feel, and animation of this film.

Would that I could say the same about the rest.

The characters are flat, the story never seems to begin, and when it does it goes nowhere. Slowly. It's as though the writers, having started to introduce a character, run out of things to do and rather than work through the block opted instead to introduce a new character. Yeah, that'll fool 'em! The film ends up feeling like Start, start, start, start, start, End.

How can you mess up a story about a mouse that refuses to be a mouse? How can you go wrong with a story involving a mouse who won't scurry or cower? If you watch the trailer for this film you see all that could have gone so very right. Unfortunately, none of that setup is really used for anything. Despereaux, the titular mouse, is just presented as being. No growth, no development, he just is. The one character who might go through a story arc, the rat Roscuro who actually launches and ends the film, isn't allowed to.

Kids might find this entertaining, but I doubt even that because kids are very good at spotting a con. I was in a theatre surrounded by kids, lots of kids, of all shapes and sizes, and none of them seemed engaged by the film. No claps, no cheers, no squeals of joy. The pretty pictures kept them busy, but that's about it. Their parents, meanwhile, were desperately looking toward the exits.

Sad, really, because those pictures are beautiful to look at. I just wish everything else had been up to par.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Not the Hero We Deserve, But the Hero We Need

The Dark Knight is the best film I’ve seen in years. Not just the best “superhero” film, but the best film of any type. It’s not perfect, not quite a masterpiece, but it’s flaws are, to me, tiny and overwhelmed by the time the film ends. While relatively bloodless, it is consistently brutal, not just in what it depicts but in the themes that drive it. TDK is a film for adults, please leave the kids at home. Let’s deal with those “flaws” first, the largest being the character Rachel Dawes . In Batman Begins , I blamed Katie Holmes . Her acting was weak, to say the least, which is regrettable in that who she is and what she says and does are important to the film. Critics agreed and either for that or other reasons, Katie was replaced by Maggie Gyllenhaal , who is a better actress. Yet here she’s weak, real weak. Maybe it’s the character, not the actress, which is frustrating because Rachel is a pivotal character. The film,...
1 comment
Read more

Dune Part 2 (2024)

I have come not to praise Dune but to bury it. I am in a distinct minority. So be it. To explain why, there will be some minor spoilers ahead; sorry. The short version is #NotMyDune. Summary: Picking up where Dune Part 1 left off, we find the young Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet) hanging out with the Fremen. Plots to overthrow rival houses and empires ensue. Go here to see what I thought about Dune Part 1 (2021) . Overall, I found it to be technically brilliant, but lacking a human heart, an exercise in frenetic slow motion. D2 is more of the same, though with far more action. Acting-wise, everyone is doing a fine, more than adequate job. Absolutely no one or nothing stands out. The way the characters are written (adapted, actually), their back and forths and interactions, are all weak and unengaging. I generally hate when they speak. I've read the novel a ridiculous number of times, and these films are prompting me to read it again. I understand that trying to translate the n...
1 comment
Read more