Skip to main content

Go, Speed Racer, Gooooooo!

Newly released on DVD, freshly available from Netflix, now overtaxing my ancient television, Speed Racer. At first glance this is an odd film for the Wachowski Brothers to pick as their follow-up to their Matrix trilogy. However, even a cursory look at those films would reveal a certain love not just for Japanese martial arts, but for Japanese animation (anime).

So here he comes, here comes Speed Racer, a film which attempts to be wholly original by taking a cartoon world and turning it into a flesh and blood spectacle. You say this has been tried before, but never to this extent. Most comic-to-film adaptations make some concession, or concessions, to reality. An easy example is Batman. Take a look at the comic Batman’s costume and compare it to any of the big-screen adaptations. From ninja tights to armored suit, which is stupid (as Moviebob very aptly pointed out).

Speed Racer, the film, makes no concessions. This is anime brought to life. Everything is bright and garish, every scene pops with an unreal color intensity. There is no attempt to subdue appearances for the sake of reality. From the first frame it is clear that this film will go no where near reality, that it will be merrily content to create its own sense of reality.

It comes damn close to working. Dirty Harry made this observation in his review of the theatrical release. That’s why I wanted to see the film, and now I find I agree. The style of Speed Racer is near-brilliant, and it’s consistent. Scene after scene is pure outlandish behavior. Everyone acts over-the-top, while at the same time the world they inhabit is deliciously over-the-top. Oh it comes so damn close to working.

But it doesn’t. I had to watch the film over two nights because the lights, color, motion, etc., made my head ache. I can’t imagine what this must have been like in a theatre. I’m not given to motion sickness when watching a film (though sitting in a car at a drive-in watching the car chase in Bullitt came close). Cloverfield didn’t make me retch, not at the theatre or during subsequent viewings on DVD, though it tried real, real hard. Yet here, for Speed, my eyes simply had to shut it out.

That I could successfully watch this over two nights illustrates the film’s real major flaw. The plot, to put it gently, sucks. Zero involvement with the characters, zero buy-in for the stakes at hand, zero “give a damn” factor all around. I found a convenient place to pause, did so, and went to bed without one whisper of an idea of thinking about considering a rumination of concern as to what would happen next. I just didn’t care.

Part of the reason I didn’t care is that it’s established right from the beginning that the laws of physics simply don’t apply. Further, drivers can suffer horrific crashes, get encased in bubbles, and simply pop out for a safe, injury-free landing. Since cars can now do anything -- even fighting each other -- and regardless of what that anything is no one will get hurt, please tell me why I should give a hoot? There is not even a twinge of threat, ever.

I understand that this, even with a PG rating, was meant to be a kid’s film, but arguably so was Transformers, yet people get squished throughout that film. Complaints about cinematic style aside, when a rocket hit someone in Transformers that person or thing was reduced to components. Dead components, at that.

And if you got lost during the action sequences in Transformers, you stand no chance during Speed Racer. So much color is swirling about while people squeal, tires shriek, engines bellow, that it's all reduced to a mind-numbing blur.

The film is deliriously silly in its underlying politics and economics. I love that the Racer family wants to be independent, sponsor free, but where in the hell does Pops get all his funding from? Sure, this was never discussed in the TV series, but there you got to see Speed & Family win lots of races with fat monetary prizes. Here...?

For crying out loud, does every single big budget film made have to slam capitalism and Big Business? Is it some secret code within the WGA, DGA, MPAA, etc.? Can’t the villains in this sort of film just once, just once, just be independent villains? Do we always have to paint Big Business as wearing waxed mustaches, busily twirling the ends and sneering?

Cast and casting is perfectly fine. I thought Emile Hirsch as Speed would drive me nuts, but he’s all right. Christina Ricci as Trixie, John Goodman as Pops, and even Susan Sarandon as Mom, were each an inspired choice. Spritle and Chim Chim drove me nuts, but they drove me nuts when I was a kid watching the TV series. Roger Allam is apparently the W brothers go-to guy for scenery-chewing villain, almost reprising his villainous villainy from V for Vendetta.

Oh, and Cosma Shiva Hagen (awesome name) as Gennie, Allam's assistant, is just amazingly easy on the eyes. I was transfixed by one shot of just her calves as she waits for Speed, watching her calve muscles twitch as she stands there in those high heels. As mesmerizing as any CGI effects shot in the entire film.

As said, the film is outstanding in creating its unreal reality. I completely bought into a time and place with huge, outlandish racetracks, with the very notion of a World Racing League. A world where billions watch every race with an intensity that even Obama fans can’t match.

Add some danger to that world, craft an actual plot, give us characters that are driven by that plot and threatened by that danger...oh, what could have been.

In the end, Speed Racer is a magnificent failure. If your eyes can stand it, it’s worth the look. Wear sunglasses, take some Dramamine and aspirin. I’d love to say that the effort pays off, but it doesn’t, at least not well. However, in this film era of cookie-cutter "creations," if you’re a film buff you should at least check out a film attempting to be something very, very different.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

Wow, it’s been over a year. What a way to get back to this blog because… Are the films of the MCU getting worse? It’s a serious question because the latest that I’ve seen, Thor: Love and Thunder and Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania , are strong arguments that the answer is “yes.” Summary: Ant-Man & Ant-Family get sucked into the quantum realm, where skullduggery is afoot. A load of crap ensues. I’m an Ant-Man fan. I loved the first film despite its flaws. It would have been wonderful to see what Edgar Wright may have wrought. It was clear, though, that replacement director Peyton Reed kept some of Wright’s ideas alive. The result was one of the MCU’s most intimate films, a straight-forward tale of a Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) desperate to remain in his daughter’s life while being “gifted” the life of a superhero. Ant-Man and the Wasp sorta stayed that course, but naturally, because this is the modern MCU, we had to have a female superhero take over, the titular Wasp (Hope van Dyne,

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that

Rogan

The entire Joe Rogan controversy is an example of the kids being left in charge and the adults refusing to teach them any better. I’m not a regular consumer of podcasts. There are a couple I listen to from time to time, but nothing on a regular basis. While I’ve caught a few minutes of the Joe Rogan Experience on YouTube, I’ve never listened to his podcast. One of the primary reasons for that is that you have to subscribe to Spotify to do so, and I prefer Qobuz, Tidal, or even Amazon Music. Rogan is behind Spotify’s paywall and that’s that. But the nature of the fight is about more than who does or does not listen to Rogan. This fight goes to the very nature of the First Amendment and the fundamental concept of the United States. And yes, I understand that cuts both ways. What’s his name and Joni Mitchell are free to yank their creations from Spotify, no ifs, ands, or buts. I’m not denying their right, I’m questioning their reasons. Rogan talks to people. He does so largely unfiltered.