Skip to main content

DVD: A Sound of Thunder

The sad fact is that for many film reviews, I’m often a little late to the party. Of course, thanks to the wonders of DVD, that party never really ends. Once upon a time, movies came and went. If you were lucky, it was re-released a few years later and you’d get a second shot at it. In our oh so modern world, however, the “re-release” happens whenever the DVD finally arrives at our doorstep.

Such is the case here, after a workmate suggested that 2005’s A Sound of Thunder was a good silly film, worth the time to watch, and loaned me her copy.

She lied.

A Sound of Thunder tries to be a throwback, a B-movie with aspirations for a higher grade. In this sense, it’s on par with one of my favorite guilty pleasure films, The Core. The Core is massively silly, but you always get the idea that the cast and crew knew it and were just having a good time. Such is not the case with A Sound of Thunder, wherein cast and crew just lumber along. It never becomes fun. The term “leaden” thuds to mind.

The film is based on the Ray Bradbury short story of the same name. Sometimes you can inflate a short and create a decent film. Total Recall, for example, is a Philip K. Dick short that was skillfully expanded into a great feature-length film. Total Recall works because the short has lots of possibilities for expansion; A Sound of Thunder does not.

The plot is simple: In the future, time travel is a reality and a company uses that technology to take hunters back in time for the hunt of a lifetime. The restriction is that you can’t touch the past in any way. The chosen prey is already fated to die at near the moment and place the hunters blast it down. The hunters wear protective suits, breath their own air supply, etc. They walk on a special path that hovers above the ground so even the grass is undisturbed.

Naturally, things go awry when one of the hunters panics and steps off the path. In doing so, he kills a butterfly. In the short, they discover this before returning to the present. The question they face is what changes in their future may have occurred as a result.

The short takes its title from the way in which Bradbury describes the way in which T-rex they are hunting roars, like “a sound of thunder.” It also comes into play at the short story's conclusion. In the film, the title is meaningless. They keep the title only as a tie-back to the short story, but little of the source material remains...pretty much just character names. After the opening, we’re told who the villain will be, with cue cards saying that humanity has created a most fantastic invention that can be used for good or evil, yet one man uses it “to make money.” Well how dare he, because making money is inherently very, very evil. Just ask any film producer or Marxist.

Our intrepid time-traveling hunters don’t discover that someone has crushed a bug until they’ve returned to the present and things start to change. Instead of a complete yet subtle shift in things due to a tiny change in the distant pass, changes happen in waves, while they watch. Why this is so is never discussed, just proclaimed. With each “time wave,” things change more and more. When the last wave hits, the last creature to have evolved (somehow determined to be us) will change. For inexplicable but plot-driven reasons, cities remain, admittedly now covered in weeds, and backup generators, those things of wonder, continue to work.

A moment’s thought would tell you to immediately jump back in time and see what the panicky hunters are about to do and stop them. But that would result in a very short, albeit logical, film. Instead, we’re subjected to a protracted and silly journey across town to find the panicky hunters and figure out what they did. In a race to fix things before that final wave turns us all into...whatever, our heroes opt to ignore the logical shortcut and go for a stroll in the park.

The film’s internal “logic” vanishes as you realize that our time-traveling hunters hunt the same dinosaur over and over. It’s never explained how, since they keep going back to the same time and place, they don’t run into other time-traveling hunters. We are just expected not to notice. But this discrepancy is rubbed in our face when going back to warn the hunters becomes our hero’s goal. Now you’re forced to wonder why he’ll only bump into the correct set of hunters and not any of the others, and why they weren’t bumbling into each other all along.

The entire cast is abused, from Oscar winner Ben Kingsley, to the steady and reliable Ed Burns, to the inexplicably hot Heike Makatsch. (What is it with German actresses lately? First I stumble upon Cosma Shiva Hagen in Speed Racer, and now Heike....)

Director Peter Hyams opted for a large-scale feel which resulted in his “vision” exceeding his budget. The film has some of the worst special effects you’ll ever see, the sort that gives CGI a bad name. You can hear him thinking, “This will look really cool,” only it never does.

I confess, Hyams’s involvement might skew my opinion. After the delightful Capricorn One, he had a shot at a prestige film, 2010; he and his ego blew it. Now he’s a hack. Amazingly, A Sound of Thunder is worse than his previous film foray into time travel, Timecop.

A Sound of Thunder is not even a guilty pleasure, it’s just crap. Thank God I didn’t buy this, so I can return it to its owner, who, at $5, was overcharged. Now I can sit back and watch a better film from my own library, something like Battlefield Earth....

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

Wow, it’s been over a year. What a way to get back to this blog because… Are the films of the MCU getting worse? It’s a serious question because the latest that I’ve seen, Thor: Love and Thunder and Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania , are strong arguments that the answer is “yes.” Summary: Ant-Man & Ant-Family get sucked into the quantum realm, where skullduggery is afoot. A load of crap ensues. I’m an Ant-Man fan. I loved the first film despite its flaws. It would have been wonderful to see what Edgar Wright may have wrought. It was clear, though, that replacement director Peyton Reed kept some of Wright’s ideas alive. The result was one of the MCU’s most intimate films, a straight-forward tale of a Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) desperate to remain in his daughter’s life while being “gifted” the life of a superhero. Ant-Man and the Wasp sorta stayed that course, but naturally, because this is the modern MCU, we had to have a female superhero take over, the titular Wasp (Hope van Dyne,

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that

Rogan

The entire Joe Rogan controversy is an example of the kids being left in charge and the adults refusing to teach them any better. I’m not a regular consumer of podcasts. There are a couple I listen to from time to time, but nothing on a regular basis. While I’ve caught a few minutes of the Joe Rogan Experience on YouTube, I’ve never listened to his podcast. One of the primary reasons for that is that you have to subscribe to Spotify to do so, and I prefer Qobuz, Tidal, or even Amazon Music. Rogan is behind Spotify’s paywall and that’s that. But the nature of the fight is about more than who does or does not listen to Rogan. This fight goes to the very nature of the First Amendment and the fundamental concept of the United States. And yes, I understand that cuts both ways. What’s his name and Joni Mitchell are free to yank their creations from Spotify, no ifs, ands, or buts. I’m not denying their right, I’m questioning their reasons. Rogan talks to people. He does so largely unfiltered.