Skip to main content

Superman Returns redux

When I first wrote about Superman Returns, I said I had the flu, skipped through it, and would really need to sit down and watch it start-to-finish. I thought I might need to have Kleenex handy.

Well I watched and no, I didn't need Kleenex. I did need caffeine, though, so luckily I had my Starbucks Barista Expresso Machine.

I stand behind most everything I wrote initially. The strongest part of film is that it offers no easy out of the threesome, Superman, Lois, and New Guy. The inner conflicts involved are nicely rendered, if never solved. I hope that Spider Man 3 does as well in this regard.

But now having seen the entire thing -- twice, mind you -- the overall feeling is...ugh. The entire Lex Luthor plot is as bad as I first thought. He's not a menacing villain, or even particularly funny. He's just...ridiculous. And he's surrounded by morons. No, seriously, genuine morons. Only Parker Posey does well, but then again, she always does. (Yeah, I've got a crush. Shoot me.)

And there's just a succession of little things that make me queasy. Like Luthor's shout of, "Bring it on!" Hmm, who is that supposed to represent? There's the vague messianic aspects of Superman here, where he tells Lois how she wrote that the world doesn't need a savior, yet he hears them calling out for one, every day. Savior? And his fall from high orbit is particular Christ-like.

Then, Superman is not Christ and, in this film, he's not even particularly noble. He spies on Lois at home, for crying out loud. Is this some allusion so some other aspect of our current world, or is Superman being reduced to a high school kid who wants the girl who probably doesn't want him so he's stalking her, yeah, that'll make her love him! I can see the sequel now, Superman: The Steel Stalker.

And so it goes. I still love Ottman's music, especially when he weaves in bits from the Williams' scores. For the most part the cinematography is spot on, though Metropolis was mostly a dull, dull looking place. The visual effects are notable for being...bland.

I need to single out the sequence with the Boeing 777 as particularly pathetic. It starts badly and just keeps getting worse. It also continues a trend from Jackson's King Kong, wherein the heroine is visibly subjected to gee-forces that should snap all her bones and turn her into a pretzel...yet her hair is only vaguely mussed. It's one thing to ask an audience to willingly suspend their sense of disbelief, it's another to abuse that willingness. Watching Jack Sparrow prance about a water wheel in a sword fight was more convincing.

So, at the end of the day, my overall feeling for Superman Returns is...feh. I'll stick with Christopher Reeve and the first two Supe films, plzthnkx (copyright Cleolinda of Movies in 15 Minutes).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Not the Hero We Deserve, But the Hero We Need

The Dark Knight is the best film I’ve seen in years. Not just the best “superhero” film, but the best film of any type. It’s not perfect, not quite a masterpiece, but it’s flaws are, to me, tiny and overwhelmed by the time the film ends. While relatively bloodless, it is consistently brutal, not just in what it depicts but in the themes that drive it. TDK is a film for adults, please leave the kids at home. Let’s deal with those “flaws” first, the largest being the character Rachel Dawes . In Batman Begins , I blamed Katie Holmes . Her acting was weak, to say the least, which is regrettable in that who she is and what she says and does are important to the film. Critics agreed and either for that or other reasons, Katie was replaced by Maggie Gyllenhaal , who is a better actress. Yet here she’s weak, real weak. Maybe it’s the character, not the actress, which is frustrating because Rachel is a pivotal character. The film,...
1 comment
Read more

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that ...
Post a Comment
Read more

We pause now for a minor rant…

“My car has a flat tire.” “You should buy a new car.” Every time I hear President Obama and other Democrats talking about “health care reform,” that’s what the conversation sounds like. A health care crisis is declared and the only solution is to replace the entire system. At most, around 15% of the American population is without health care insurance. Ignoring the fact that for most of them, this is a matter of choice, it also means that 85% are insured. And of that 85%, something like 70+% like their current coverage and don’t want the government to touch it. So for the vast majority, the current system works and works great. Yet, because of the minority for whom it allegedly does not...toss it all, start again. Admittedly, regardless of insurance coverage, it all costs too much, but again, the only accepted approach to controlling costs are to throw out everything and turn it all over to the government. Tactics that are proposed to address specific cost issues are not consid...
Post a Comment
Read more