Skip to main content

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

Wow, it’s been over a year. What a way to get back to this blog because…

Are the films of the MCU getting worse? It’s a serious question because the latest that I’ve seen, Thor: Love and Thunder and Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, are strong arguments that the answer is “yes.”

Summary: Ant-Man & Ant-Family get sucked into the quantum realm, where skullduggery is afoot. A load of crap ensues.

I’m an Ant-Man fan. I loved the first film despite its flaws. It would have been wonderful to see what Edgar Wright may have wrought. It was clear, though, that replacement director Peyton Reed kept some of Wright’s ideas alive. The result was one of the MCU’s most intimate films, a straight-forward tale of a Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) desperate to remain in his daughter’s life while being “gifted” the life of a superhero.

Ant-Man and the Wasp sorta stayed that course, but naturally, because this is the modern MCU, we had to have a female superhero take over, the titular Wasp (Hope van Dyne, portrayed by Evangeline Lilly). The result was that the film, while still maintaining a breezy tone and an intimate feel (they were not trying to save the world), shoved Ant-Man to the back of the bus and the Wasp ran the show.

This was also the film that introduced the “quantum realm,” where Wasp’s mother Janet van Dyne (Michele Pfeifer) had been trapped, until her father, Hank Pym (Michael Douglas), figured out a way to rescue her. And it’s that realm that lends the quantum to the mania of this film.

It’s also where it becomes immediately apparent that the creators of this film could not care less about the groundwork they themselves did in previous films. The quantum realm that Scott sank into at the climax of his first film was abstract art, an ever-evolving arena with no human frame of reference. In the second film, the quantum realm that Pym descended into to rescue Janet was vaguely recognizable while at the same time feeling alien and hostile. For this film, the quantum realm that our plucky band gets sucked into would look perfectly all right for a Star Wars adventure or, even more on point, “the grid” from the TRON films. It is, in other words, hopelessly generic. It is also populated by hopelessly generic people and creatures. It is so very, very ordinary.

It’s not as if they followed their own “rules” anyway. In the first film, the quantum realm isn’t really a place. In the second, Hank must wear a pressure suit and travel via a special craft; it was an unresolved mystery how Janet survived in such an environment for 30 years, but there were slight hints of improv (e.g., her suit). She was also trapped for 30 years, quantum time as well as our world. Yet when Scott was trapped for five years in our time, it was a blink of an eye for him being in the quantum realm (despite their demonstrating real time communication). It’s a sign of terrible writing when you establish one set of rules, change them when they become inconvenient, and then change them yet again because your new story demands a different set of rules.

The result is that you immediately just do not care. Since anything can change at anytime, nothing really matters. It’s the weakest part of the otherwise wonderful Avengers: Infinity War (and I’ll eventually get around to discussing that film, along with its woefully inferior sequel, Endgame) and the same plague strikes here as in so many of the MCU (and Disney and Star Wars) films.

Even characters change on a whim. At the end of The Wasp, Janet was revealed to have some special gifts and/or powers. Here, all gone. Instead, she’s been keeping a secret that threatens all of existence. Why? Because at the end of The Wasp, the situation didn’t exist. Here, they needed Kang (Jonathan Majors) to be there for The Plot. Who needs continuity? On to the next shiny new thing!

The acting from everyone, with one exception, feels like a bunch of people collecting a paycheck. Only one stands out, albeit briefly, and that’s Majors. For much of the film, he brings a legit menace to Kang the Conqueror. He speaks softly, moves with deliberation, and is generally wonderful and the single best thing in the entire film. He’s being set up as a Big Baddy for MCU Phase 5, and there’s a hint that yes, maybe. Sorta like Thanos in Infinity War.

And like Thanos in Endgame, he throws it all away and becomes Generic Baddie #30 (number depending on how you breakdown the films that preceded this one). It’s such a waste.

Some characters legit annoy the crap out of me. Cassie (here played by Kathryn Newton because to heck with Emma Fuhrmann for some reason) is a terrible daughter and a rotten human being. She’s ungrateful, unloving, and self-centered to a repellent degree. She is all about the causes she fights for to “save the planet.” She berates her father, who just bailed her out of jail, for not doing more to help and dismisses with a sniff that he just fought to save the actual, entire universe. It’s a grotesque display of “but what have you done for me lately.”

The film writers add insult to injury when she becomes the MCU’s latest young girl super genius, following in the wretched footsteps of Shuri (Letitia Wright, of the Black Panther films) and Riri Williams (Dominique Thorne, introduced in Wakanda Forever). Super brilliant women who know oh so much more than the men and are filled with open scorn for all the work others did before them. Here, Cassie invents a quantum realm scanner thingie just from reading Hank’s notes.

Sure.

The film devolves into a Janet adventure. It’s really all about her and her secret adventures for 30 years in the quantum realm. It’s her past that is catching up with her and the others, that drives the plot, that leads to the ultimate climax. The titular Ant-Man is just given a series of fights to participate in and nothing more. Even at the end, at the height of his climatic battle, he only achieves success because the Wasp buzzes in for the rescue. Janet and Cassie win the day, yay?

Is this all inherently bad? No, of course not. Little coincidences and contrivances like this propel many adventure films. It’s all just so sloppy, though. From early in the film, I couldn’t shake the feeling that this was a weird reimagining of Tron: Legacy. The entire quantum realm felt and acted like the grid. Kang was a substitute for Clu and his army of blue-glowing faced warriors had me hearing “Rectify!” Kang even begins a speech that may as well have culminated with “Out there is our destiny!” Well, maybe it would have if Cassie hadn’t interrupted and delivered the absolute worst “fight for the Oasis!” speech ever. Cassie, who no one in this world knows, rather than Janet, who many do know and might have rallied to.

On and on, the film is terrible in all regards. Well, Christopher Beck’s score works, about the only thing that does. Since he’s scored all three Ant-Films, there’s a nice musical consistency between them. It’s all in the service of crap, though.

The effects are mediocre, both visual and audio. The acting is bad, despite Majors’ efforts. The writing is nothing short of atrocious. Ed Wood would have done better.

The film’s major purpose is to set up Loki season two, returning the favor that Loki season one set up this film. Kang is an emasculated villain; he’s already been defeated. That there are a lot of him is irrelevant. And has he really been defeated, or will the Citadel of Ricks be defeated, once again, by Rick Prime?

Sorry, will Kang the Exile, come back to life and defeat the Council of Kang? Who knows, who cares?

I don’t. I’d rather re-watch Rick and Morty, which does all of this so much better.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Not the Hero We Deserve, But the Hero We Need

The Dark Knight is the best film I’ve seen in years. Not just the best “superhero” film, but the best film of any type. It’s not perfect, not quite a masterpiece, but it’s flaws are, to me, tiny and overwhelmed by the time the film ends. While relatively bloodless, it is consistently brutal, not just in what it depicts but in the themes that drive it. TDK is a film for adults, please leave the kids at home. Let’s deal with those “flaws” first, the largest being the character Rachel Dawes . In Batman Begins , I blamed Katie Holmes . Her acting was weak, to say the least, which is regrettable in that who she is and what she says and does are important to the film. Critics agreed and either for that or other reasons, Katie was replaced by Maggie Gyllenhaal , who is a better actress. Yet here she’s weak, real weak. Maybe it’s the character, not the actress, which is frustrating because Rachel is a pivotal character. The film,...

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that ...

We pause now for a minor rant…

“My car has a flat tire.” “You should buy a new car.” Every time I hear President Obama and other Democrats talking about “health care reform,” that’s what the conversation sounds like. A health care crisis is declared and the only solution is to replace the entire system. At most, around 15% of the American population is without health care insurance. Ignoring the fact that for most of them, this is a matter of choice, it also means that 85% are insured. And of that 85%, something like 70+% like their current coverage and don’t want the government to touch it. So for the vast majority, the current system works and works great. Yet, because of the minority for whom it allegedly does not...toss it all, start again. Admittedly, regardless of insurance coverage, it all costs too much, but again, the only accepted approach to controlling costs are to throw out everything and turn it all over to the government. Tactics that are proposed to address specific cost issues are not consid...