Skip to main content

Rogue One: A Star Wars Story


With its release on home video, we come to the unsurprising and yet still bitter disappointment that is Rogue One: A Star Wars Story. Unsurprising, because of a lousy director. Disappointing, because it should have been great. To explain further will involve light spoilers; I will avoid larger giveaways.
In a galaxy far, far away, the Empire continues to consolidate its power after the fall of the Republic (see Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith). Toward that end, they are assembling a giant battle station, the Death Star. The Rebel Alliance plots a way of finding out what’s going on and perhaps, in the process, save their collective butts. Rebellious galivanting ensues.
All of the elements necessary to craft a good story are here, yet none of them work. The blame lies almost exclusively at the feet of director Gareth Edwards. This is his third film (after Monsters and Godzilla) and his failings as a director stand out in each. The major problems with each film involve the people, namely that they never feel or act like people. Be it the decidedly unlikeable couple in Monsters, or the horrible performance of what’s-his-face in Godzilla, the people in Edwards’ films just make me cringe and root for whoever or whatever is attempting to kill them. I never accept them as actual people and never understand why I should care whether they live or die.
The second major failing of R1 is Disney’s fault. You could have hoped for something new, a new story within an expansive universe. You could have hoped that the never-ending fan service and rehashes of The Force Awakens were limited to that film. Alas, your hopes would be dashed by R1. There are nonsensical cameos in this film, at least one of which is jarring, completely out of time and place. The film couldn’t entirely avoid references to Star Wars IV: A New Hope. After all, the end of R1 needs to tie into the beginning of SW4 (the one thing it mostly succeeds in doing, by the way). Still, in total the flood of tie-ins become annoying.
There is not one single likeable or agreeable or even interesting character in the entire film (a robot comes closest), which is a rather amazing accomplishment when you think about it. Much has been made about the diverse cast, of which Donnie Yen and Wen Jiang are easily the best, but it’s squandered.
No one expresses any sense of genuine motivation and there’s no background, backdrop, backstory, etc. What is the Empire and why is it bad? Who are the Rebels and why are they good? What is the Alliance and why do we care? Who are any of the people involved with any of the above and why should I give a damn? All of this information may be conveyed in simply moments, with almost throwaway lines. Even in The Empire Strikes Back there were occasional moments that gave you bits of background, some sense as to why people are doing what they’re doing, some notion of the stakes at play. Here, as with The Force Awakens, nothing.
The entire film lacks context. The appearance of Jimmy Smits is a perfect illustration of this. Who is he? What’s he doing? Who will he trust his life with? In order to understand any of this you must have seen at least the prequels. If you come into R1 cold, as at least a couple of my friends did, you have no idea what’s going on.
As a result, the film suffers from a deplorable excess of Things Happen Because Plot. For example, near the film’s very beginning, Diego Luna’s character, one of the film’s heroes mind you, kills a friend and ally by shooting him in the back. He does this in order to complete his mission and, apparently, ensure his personal survival. But later in the film he won’t “take the shot” needed to complete his mission and, apparently, ensure his personal survival. Instead, he has some vague, unmotivated epiphany because Plot.
One character lets himself be killed because Statement. His death achieves precisely nothing; it’s not even a coherent statement. Another is saved one moment by not being assassinated, only to be killed in the next, again because Statement. People die because it’s all supposed to be dark and edgy, but instead it’s all gratuitous. I feel like asking the writers why Character X had to die and I suspect they’d say that since X isn’t in any of the other films, X must have died, but that’s less than stupid if you accept that the SW universe is something larger than what’s so far been shown. Apparently it’s not, so X (and Y and Z and...) must die.
On a technical level the film is somewhat all right. I hate most of the camera work, which is often of the free-floating, hand-held variety. The action sequences are by-the-numbers, with nothing either terribly wrong or terrifically great. Several classic characters pop up via CGI; several are actually appropriate but for others it’s just awful. One at the film’s end is atrocious, but then, the very end of the film is entirely wrong. Bad edit, bad music, horrible CGI face, and a tone-deaf transition. Honest, the last moments of the film are too horrible for words.
Speaking of music, Michael Giacchino turns in a dull score. I am loathe to blame him because he generally does stellar work. Rumor has it that his original score was rejected and he was told to replace it with something more “Star Warsy.” The result is generic and forgettable, without a single musical note worth remembering other than the very first. Literally, the very first, which is a foreboding and ominous variation of the BAH that usually kicks off a Star Wars film. Those opening notes are fantastic and precisely the correct tone. Then it all goes horribly wrong.
Which is exactly what happened with the film. Here was an opportunity to show that the cinematic Star Wars universe was more than The Skywalker Family Saga. Here was an opportunity to weave a fantastic action adventure, a science fiction war thriller in the mold of The Guns of Navarone (a film I kept thinking about while watching R1).
Instead we got a stink bomb and the memory of lost opportunities.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

Wow, it’s been over a year. What a way to get back to this blog because… Are the films of the MCU getting worse? It’s a serious question because the latest that I’ve seen, Thor: Love and Thunder and Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania , are strong arguments that the answer is “yes.” Summary: Ant-Man & Ant-Family get sucked into the quantum realm, where skullduggery is afoot. A load of crap ensues. I’m an Ant-Man fan. I loved the first film despite its flaws. It would have been wonderful to see what Edgar Wright may have wrought. It was clear, though, that replacement director Peyton Reed kept some of Wright’s ideas alive. The result was one of the MCU’s most intimate films, a straight-forward tale of a Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) desperate to remain in his daughter’s life while being “gifted” the life of a superhero. Ant-Man and the Wasp sorta stayed that course, but naturally, because this is the modern MCU, we had to have a female superhero take over, the titular Wasp (Hope van Dyne,

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that

Rogan

The entire Joe Rogan controversy is an example of the kids being left in charge and the adults refusing to teach them any better. I’m not a regular consumer of podcasts. There are a couple I listen to from time to time, but nothing on a regular basis. While I’ve caught a few minutes of the Joe Rogan Experience on YouTube, I’ve never listened to his podcast. One of the primary reasons for that is that you have to subscribe to Spotify to do so, and I prefer Qobuz, Tidal, or even Amazon Music. Rogan is behind Spotify’s paywall and that’s that. But the nature of the fight is about more than who does or does not listen to Rogan. This fight goes to the very nature of the First Amendment and the fundamental concept of the United States. And yes, I understand that cuts both ways. What’s his name and Joni Mitchell are free to yank their creations from Spotify, no ifs, ands, or buts. I’m not denying their right, I’m questioning their reasons. Rogan talks to people. He does so largely unfiltered.