Skip to main content

Jupiter Ascending

I confess that I'm generally a fan of the Wachowskis. The only film of theirs I haven't seen (yet) is their first, Bound. And while I don't think The Matrix is as fantastic as many of its most ardent fans say, I'm also a little more upbeat on the two sequels. I actually liked Speed Racer, if for no other reason than the sheer gusto with which it sought to create a live action cartoon. And while Cloud Atlas is ultimately a rather empty experience, it is at least well-made and brilliantly edited.

At the end of the day, the largest issue with any Wachowski production is how damn serious they take themselves. They interject trite, flyweight philosophical comments and believe that these form the soul of the production. To get an utter earful of what I'm talking about, just watch any of The Matrix films while listening to the philosophers’ commentary track. It's hilarious, though I don't think it's meant that way.

All of this has led us to Jupiter Ascending, and I'm befuddled by the experience. I'm sure there's meant to be some serious commentary in there somewhere, but it's all so extremely silly, the very essence of vapid, that I'm laughing too hard to recognize what it is. At the same time, I confess that I was, for the most part, entertained from start to finish. It's a grand space opera full of grandeur and grand vistas. It has some grand old ideas writ large on the silver screen. It should have been grand, I say, grand! Alas…

Jupiter Ascending is the story of how Jupiter Jones (Mila Kunis) comes to America and ends up washing toilets as part of the family housecleaning business. She also turns out to be the genetic match for the matriarch of one of the most powerful families in the universe. How'd that happen? Well, that's one of the questions that drives much of the story, so we'll leave that hanging for now.

Meanwhile, the story unfolds as three siblings all vie to gain control (or kill) Jupiter because if she owns the Earth, she would become very rich and very powerful and totally muck up their plans. There's Kalique (Tuppence Middleton) who wants to be Jupiter's sisterly friend (difficult because Jupiter is a match for Kalique's mom); Titus (Douglas Booth), who has his own strangely incestuous designs; and Balem (Eddie Redmayne), who just wants her dead.

Fortunately, she has a defender named Caine Wise (Channing Tatum), half-man, half-dog, er, wolf (look, it's the reimagining of Barf!) and Caine's bee-based buddy Stinger (Sean Bean). "Bee-based"? Why yes, because it seems that these delightful aliens are actually humans because humans apparently rule the entire universe and love nothing more than splicing human DNA with different creatures Just Because. So Caine is part wolf because that makes him a great tracker and warrior and Stinger is part bee because…honey? There's even an alien who is spliced with an elephant and they name him Nesh (Nicholas A. Newman) and I'll leave it to you to look up why. In the end I was left wondering whether there were any actual, you know, aliens in this outer space epic.

There is so much going on that it makes one dizzy. It's all well and good to have a complex plot but this has a complex universe and complex people are explaining its complexity all of the time. There's so much tell that it often feels like there's little time for show, and show is what makes movies work. Tell stops the action cold and, surprise, that's what keeps happening in Jupiter Ascending.

It also doesn't help that just this year I've seen John Wick, Kingsmen, and Mad Max: Fury Road (more on that another day, but holy cow, what a great film). The action in each of these makes Jupiter Ascending look and feel tepid. The Wachowskis are known, if for nothing else, for their action sequences and here they've been upstaged, outdone, and left for dead. Even without comparisons to those other films, the action in the film is just limp and repetitive. It also collapses under a moment's thought. Caine has this shield which is apparently good against any form of attack, even from ships that just a moment before blew a starship out of the sky. Awesome! And somehow he always has it where it needs to be, even when he's surrounded. Amazing, no? No.

I know you're not supposed to spend too much time thinking about these things in films like these, but sometimes they just smack you in the face. Another one: Caine is taken prisoner and while they take away all of his other toys, er, weapons, they let him keep his special flying roller blade boots. Such nice cops…

Even if you ignore all of that nonsense, the acting never rises to mediocre. Redmayne is particularly awful in an absolutely dreadful way. There's no chemistry between any of the actors on any level. "Bland" is the best word to describe the lot of them. The role of Jupiter required an actress capable of carrying an entire film, similar to how Jennifer Lawrence has to carry the entire Hunger Games series. Kunis isn't up to the task.

Michael Giacchino's music is his first dud. There are couple of musical cues which are memorable, but overall it is either overwrought or flat. The cinematography is likewise meh. Much is made about how much work went into filming an aerial chase over Chicago, but the end product, while beautifully lit, just doesn't seem to justify the hype. They swear much of it was shot practical, without CGI, but it doesn’t come off that way. The visual effects are all well done, but that's just the standard nowadays.

So I find myself in a quandary. Realistically speaking, Jupiter Ascending is a disaster. This is the first time I find myself unable to defend a Wachowski film, and remember, I like Speed Racer! At the same time, though, there is such grandeur to the production, a tremendous sense of scale to the universe they created. I love space operas and here was a chance to make a great one, one for the ages, and maybe that's what I can find to love here, the sheer Wachowski willingness to absolutely go all out and produce the grandest space opera ever. I want to return to the universe they created and go exploring.

Unfortunately, the story they created within that universe is mind bogglingly dull, which means they had their shot and blew it. If you love style for style’s sake and want to see some hints of some amazing world-building, Jupiter Ascending may be worth the view. It also, on occasion, rises to the level of being craptastic (I mean, come on, Nesh trumpets when he’s steering his spaceship), so there’s that. If, however, you want a good, well-told story, a film that actually does something with all that universe building, look elsewhere.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I (Briefly) Try a Mac

 I Bought a Mac. My first computer was an Atari 800, fully loaded with 48k of RAM. And I mean the original, beige model, not its low-slung, fancy successor. My friend went for an Apple IIe, which cost a relative fortune. Eventually, I’d step up to an Atari 1040ST, while he’d get a IIgs. And even more eventually, we both ended up with IBM PC compatibles. MSDOS was my friend, Unix an ally. It was with great reluctance that I transition from a command-line interface (CLI) to a Graphic User Interface (GUI), always on a PC platform and never a Mac. I never bought into the hype and never experienced all the horrid things that allegedly befell anyone using a PC. For me, they just worked. Yet here I am, these many decades later, typing this on a brand-new MacBook Air M4. How things change... Initially, there was little regret but a mounting list of frustrations. Adjusting to the keyboard isn’t too hard, it’s just a matter of experimentation. Learning how to scale the display wasn’t awful, ...

Dune Part 2 (2024)

I have come not to praise Dune but to bury it. I am in a distinct minority. So be it. To explain why, there will be some minor spoilers ahead; sorry. The short version is #NotMyDune. Summary: Picking up where Dune Part 1 left off, we find the young Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet) hanging out with the Fremen. Plots to overthrow rival houses and empires ensue. Go here to see what I thought about Dune Part 1 (2021) . Overall, I found it to be technically brilliant, but lacking a human heart, an exercise in frenetic slow motion. D2 is more of the same, though with far more action. Acting-wise, everyone is doing a fine, more than adequate job. Absolutely no one or nothing stands out. The way the characters are written (adapted, actually), their back and forths and interactions, are all weak and unengaging. I generally hate when they speak. I've read the novel a ridiculous number of times, and these films are prompting me to read it again. I understand that trying to translate the n...

Have I mentioned I saw Monsters vs. Aliens?

It’s possible that Pixar is becoming a blight on the world of animation. Yes, they do some really great work ( The Incredibles , Ratatouille ), but they’ve also done some clunkers ( Cars , Wall-E ). Their greatest sin, though, is that they apparently radiate a variation of the Steve Jobs Reality Distortion Field, so that any other animated film – especially if done with CG – is automatically judged inferior. There is some justification to this, but you don’t see every live action film being compared to, say, the films of Ingmar Bergman (well, except by brooding people wearing dark glasses sitting in dim coffee shops smoking clove cigarettes discussing cinema, damn you ). In the traditional film world, it’s accepted that different artists turn out different products. In the animated world, everyone is supposed to match or surpass Pixar, or so it seems. Needless to say, that’s just a crock. Monsters vs Aliens is to your typical Pixar production as Spielberg is to Scorsese. And I h...