Skip to main content

Godzilla (2014)

Ugh.

I am not going to claim I am some great Godzilla specialist, or even a big-time fan, but the original Godzilla, King of the Monsters (1956) was an automatic watch whenever it was on Creature Features. Or at any other time. And decades later, when the original Raymond Burr-less Gojira (1954) finally became available in the US, it was awesome to see that giant monster in all his original, indifferent to humanity, "I crush you!" glory.

This rendition isn't even in the same league as the Americanized 1956 version, let alone the 1954 original. Even the generally awful, yet somehow guiltily entertaining, 1998 version, is better.

The irony is that in this film the one who knows all about Godzilla is, again, a Japanese scientist, Dr. Ichiro Serizawa (Ken Watanabe), but the film opts to focus on the American white bread character, Lt. Ford Brody (Aaron Taylor-Johnson). So just as in the original, when that film's Dr. Serizawa (Akihiko Hirata) got to be upstaged by American insert Steve Martin (Raymond Burr), it happens again here.

Which is sad because it's clear that Serizawa has some idea of what is going on, who and what Godzilla is (he names the beast!), and yet he's kept in the back of the bus. The result is that we follow the stumble along exploits of Brody, who just wants to get back home to San Francisco and his wife (Elizabeth Olsen) and son (Carson Bolde).

And that story is awful.

All of the trailers to this film make it seem that Brody's father (Bryan Cranston) is the main character. As you see in the trailer, his wife (Juliette Binoche) dies in a nuclear reactor accident in Japan. Following her death, Brody the Senior remains in Japan on a 15-year obsessive quest to find out what really happened, what actually killed his wife. When he finally hooks up with Serizawa, there's a feeling that the story might be about to take off.

Alas, no. Brody the Junior shows up to bail his father out of jail and becomes the center of attention because he's apparently the only member of the United States military, stationed anywhere in the world, who can both disarm and arm nuclear warheads. In a series of coincidences that made my head ache, he begins his journey from Japan to San Francisco. Along the way, monsters cavort in a distracting manner.

Seriously. The monsters in this monster film are firmly in the background, in the back of the bus behind the part at the back of the bus where Serizawa is. Why Godzilla should give a hoot that a MUTO (massive unknown terrestrial organism) is munching parts of Japan, Hawaii, and my home town is utterly unknown. Yes, Serizawa says the Big G is an "alpha predator" and they should just let him take care of the MUTO, but wouldn't exploring that history have been more interesting than...well, anything that happens in this film?

It doesn't help that Taylor-Johnson is godawful. Keanu Reeves, the original acting 2x4, on his absolute worse day does better than this guy. In the film, he occasionally seems all right because Olsen is even worse. Their acting is bland, their characters are bland, the entire reason for their existence is less than bland. Cranston at least got to chew some scenery and had a (loud and) clear reason for his behavior. Equally clear is that Watanabe has some sort of backstory with all of this, and I don't mean just because he's a Hiroshima survivor.

Yet, we follow Lt. Bland. Lacking a compelling human lead, or a compelling human story, we are left with gaping pauses between monster appearances. There's no build up of suspense because we just don't give a busted Golden Gate Bridge about the very people whose sole purpose is to draw us in and carry us through this story.

That this would happen should have been obvious from the moment Gareth Edwards was brought on board to direct, because the last film he directed, Monsters, had the exact same problem. That film promised monsters and instead we got humans we prayed would be consumed so as to put us out of our misery. (Mind you, I liked the manner in which Monsters was made, guerilla-style, but the end result...awful.)

Not everything in Godzilla is horrible. The MUTO, though it has a horrible acronym instead of a name, is pretty impressive in its own right. This rendition of Godzilla (who strangely has a name while his prey does not) is really impressive. And when (finally) the beasts do fight...awesome!

(Though on a purely personal level, I was a little annoyed. I'm San Francisco bred, born, and raised, and I was thrilled to hear that my beloved City by the Bay was finally going to get the smashed to smithereens treatment. And yet the place was hardly recognizable. For crying out loud, the streets were flat! Hello, filmmakers, San Francisco, as with Rome, is built on hills. It's topography is the very opposite of flat. And aside from the Transamerica Pyramid and a brief glimpse of the Ferry Building, I didn't recognize a single building or street. And now I'm sad...)

But back to the good stuff. Oh wait, I've already covered that, i.e., the monsters and the monster fights. Awesome stuff, especially watching Godzilla's moves. The climatic fight, how it's settled...hot damn, great stuff!

And then the humans putter back into the film and...ugh.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Not the Hero We Deserve, But the Hero We Need

The Dark Knight is the best film I’ve seen in years. Not just the best “superhero” film, but the best film of any type. It’s not perfect, not quite a masterpiece, but it’s flaws are, to me, tiny and overwhelmed by the time the film ends. While relatively bloodless, it is consistently brutal, not just in what it depicts but in the themes that drive it. TDK is a film for adults, please leave the kids at home. Let’s deal with those “flaws” first, the largest being the character Rachel Dawes . In Batman Begins , I blamed Katie Holmes . Her acting was weak, to say the least, which is regrettable in that who she is and what she says and does are important to the film. Critics agreed and either for that or other reasons, Katie was replaced by Maggie Gyllenhaal , who is a better actress. Yet here she’s weak, real weak. Maybe it’s the character, not the actress, which is frustrating because Rachel is a pivotal character. The film,...
1 comment
Read more

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that ...
Post a Comment
Read more

We pause now for a minor rant…

“My car has a flat tire.” “You should buy a new car.” Every time I hear President Obama and other Democrats talking about “health care reform,” that’s what the conversation sounds like. A health care crisis is declared and the only solution is to replace the entire system. At most, around 15% of the American population is without health care insurance. Ignoring the fact that for most of them, this is a matter of choice, it also means that 85% are insured. And of that 85%, something like 70+% like their current coverage and don’t want the government to touch it. So for the vast majority, the current system works and works great. Yet, because of the minority for whom it allegedly does not...toss it all, start again. Admittedly, regardless of insurance coverage, it all costs too much, but again, the only accepted approach to controlling costs are to throw out everything and turn it all over to the government. Tactics that are proposed to address specific cost issues are not consid...
Post a Comment
Read more