Skip to main content

Thor: The Dark World

Maybe I’m suffering superhero burnout, because my reaction to Thor: The Dark World is pretty much, “Meh.” Which is disappointing, given how much I enjoyed Thor. T:TDW is certainly enjoyable in many respects. It has great moments. Unfortunately, the moments don’t really add up to anything that feels like a complete movie.

In T:TDW, Thor (Chris Hemsworth), the Norse God of Thunder, Lightning, and general I-will-kick-your-ass, has been fighting to restore peace in the nine realms. Apparently when the Bifrost was destroyed at the end of Thor (the bifrost being colorful thingee that allows Thor & Co. to traipse about the galaxy), the other realms saw this and went, “Woohoo, no more Asgardian overlords!” and started raising hell. This is why Thor plopped back onto Earth during The Avengers (or so it’s implied).

As T:TDW begins, following a numbing expository dump about the film’s main bad guys, Thor is helping to quell...something. It’s just a brawl, without any further description or purpose than I’ve given it here. If you’ve seen the trailers, you’ve seen how it ends, with Rock Rock Rock getting reduced to Pebbles Pebbles Pebbles.

But lo, dark forces are afoot. How dark? So dark they actually call themselves dark, as in Dark Elves. Lead by Malekith (Christopher Eccleston), they seek to find the aether, an effervescent weapon capable to returning the entire universe back to darkness, the way it was before the big bang (I guess). Problem is, the aether has bubbled into Jane Foster (Natalie Portman), Thor’s human girlfriend back on Earth. This leads to a reunion and a free trip to Asgard for her, where she gets the stink-eye from Lady Sif (Jaimie Alexander) and nothing but a “worthless mortal” routine from Odin (Anthony Hopkins).

I wish I was joking.

Writing this makes it all sound worse than it actually is, but it’s not really all that good or great. It all looks wonderful, and Hemsworth does a fine job as Thor. The film leaps to new heights when he’s forced to ally himself with his kinda-sorta-in-a-way-not-really brother, Loki (Tom Hiddleston). Hiddleston is simply note perfect as Loki, perfect in the way that Robert Downey Jr. is perfect as Tony Stark/Iron Man. Perfect in the way that bacon perfects any breakfast, lunch, or dinner.

Once we’re into the bromance between Thor and Loki, the film is the better for it and everyone should indeed kneel before Hiddleston and give much thanks.

There’s much running around, destruction of epic proportions, and some humor that is all wrong but other bits that are touches of perfection. Humor that is all wrong is how Erik Selvig (Stellan Skarsgard) is treated in this film, as nothing more than a buffoon. The character, and actor, deserve better.

The better comedic relief comes from Darcy Lewis (Kat Dennings); she’s perfect. It would be real easy for her to become annoying, but she strives mightily not to be so. Watching her torture Ian, her intern, is pretty priceless. And watching her point and say, “It’s meow meow” as Thor’s hammer, Mjolnir, whizzes by is hilarious. And speaking of Meow Meow, Mjolnir gives one of the film’s best performance. No, seriously, it’s hilarious and perfect and makes an otherwise tedious climatic battle a great deal more fun than it might otherwise have been.

Maybe that’s my problem with the film, the level of destruction and its sheer repetition. It’s now become the norm that the villains in superhero films must, at a minimum, be intent on destroying the entire damn planet. Here, they want to destroy the entire damnitall universe. Why? Much like why people climb mountains, villains want to destroy the universe Just Because It’s There.

So in The Avengers, New York is thrashed. In Man of Steel, Metropolis is thrashed. In Thor: The Dark World, all sorts of British things are thrashed, worlds are ravaged, and even Asgard takes a licking (yet keeps on ticking), with the ultimate goal being the annihilation of everything everywhere. It felt boring, something the apocalypse should never feel like.

In the Marvel film universe, where else is there to go? Will each successive film find a new threat to all of existence, that only our merry band, either singly or together, can prevent? It’s like car chases. At first, with a few, they were thrilling (see Bullitt, The French Connection, and The Seven-Ups), but then they just became repetitive (see all others).

Is this the fate of the superhero genre? Do you have to threaten existence itself in order to generate any excitement, or the need for such heroic firepower?

If Thor: The Dark World is any indication, that might be the case and it’s already getting boring. Is it a spoiler to mention that the teaser presented during the closing credits hints that this is the case? (And, by the way, I agree with director Alan Taylor that this little teaser just looks all kinds of horrible; it is jarringly terrible compared to the rest of the film.)

For me, The Avengers was a fun film that doesn’t hold up all that well. T:TDW hints that it’s only going to get worse. Too bad, because the genre has more to offer than variations of Armageddon (see all Marvel films prior to The Avengers). Even the notion of a Norse god dating a human woman has possibilities, as set up in Thor and which this film pretty much ignores to its detriment except for the few times when it’s convenient for the plot.

I hope I’m wrong, because I like most of what they’ve done with Thor, his relationship with “mortals,” and especially his dynamic with Loki. More of that and less apocalypse would be great.

Alas, I’m not holding my breath.


Wilma Meier said…
Yeah, yeah, yeah...tell us what you really thought of the movie Bob! (LOL)

Wilma (at wilwes dot com)

Popular posts from this blog

Not the Hero We Deserve, But the Hero We Need

The Dark Knight is the best film I’ve seen in years. Not just the best “superhero” film, but the best film of any type. It’s not perfect, not quite a masterpiece, but it’s flaws are, to me, tiny and overwhelmed by the time the film ends. While relatively bloodless, it is consistently brutal, not just in what it depicts but in the themes that drive it. TDK is a film for adults, please leave the kids at home.Let’s deal with those “flaws” first, the largest being the character Rachel Dawes. In Batman Begins, I blamed Katie Holmes. Her acting was weak, to say the least, which is regrettable in that who she is and what she says and does are important to the film. Critics agreed and either for that or other reasons, Katie was replaced by Maggie Gyllenhaal, who is a better actress. Yet here she’s weak, real weak. Maybe it’s the character, not the actress, which is frustrating because Rachel is a pivotal character. The film, at almost two and a half hours, might be a shade long. Having said t…

Rogue One: A Star Wars Story

With its release on home video, we come to the unsurprising and yet still bitter disappointment that is Rogue One: A Star Wars Story. Unsurprising, because of a lousy director. Disappointing, because it should have been great. To explain further will involve light spoilers; I will avoid larger giveaways. In a galaxy far, far away, the Empire continues to consolidate its power after the fall of the Republic (see Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith). Toward that end, they are assembling a giant battle station, the Death Star. The Rebel Alliance plots a way of finding out what’s going on and perhaps, in the process, save their collective butts. Rebellious galivanting ensues. All of the elements necessary to craft a good story are here, yet none of them work. The blame lies almost exclusively at the feet of director Gareth Edwards. This is his third film (after Monsters and Godzilla) and his failings as a director stand out in each. The major problems with each film involve the peopl…

Conspiracy (2001)

The Holocaust remains an unfathomable atrocity, the unholy benchmark by which all such are measured. Stalin and Mao both make Hitler look like an amateur when it came to sheer body count, yet the Holocaust remains unique. It seems to boil down to two reasons. First, the Nazis were terrifying in their systematic approach to the slaughter of Jews, driven by their ideological belief that they were acting for the greater good of all mankind. And second, they hunted Jews in any land they conquered; the goal wasn't merely to "purify" Germany, but the world. Few films have captured these points as well as HBO's 2001 film, Conspiracy. On January 20, 1942, a group of senior officials of Nazi Germany met at a lovely house in the Berlin suburb of Wannsee. The purpose of their meeting was to determine the "final solution" for the Jews. The Wannsee Conference developed what is referred to as the Wannsee Protocol. A single copy of the document remains. Conspiracy, drawi…