Skip to main content

Thor: The Dark World

Maybe I’m suffering superhero burnout, because my reaction to Thor: The Dark World is pretty much, “Meh.” Which is disappointing, given how much I enjoyed Thor. T:TDW is certainly enjoyable in many respects. It has great moments. Unfortunately, the moments don’t really add up to anything that feels like a complete movie.

In T:TDW, Thor (Chris Hemsworth), the Norse God of Thunder, Lightning, and general I-will-kick-your-ass, has been fighting to restore peace in the nine realms. Apparently when the Bifrost was destroyed at the end of Thor (the bifrost being colorful thingee that allows Thor & Co. to traipse about the galaxy), the other realms saw this and went, “Woohoo, no more Asgardian overlords!” and started raising hell. This is why Thor plopped back onto Earth during The Avengers (or so it’s implied).

As T:TDW begins, following a numbing expository dump about the film’s main bad guys, Thor is helping to quell...something. It’s just a brawl, without any further description or purpose than I’ve given it here. If you’ve seen the trailers, you’ve seen how it ends, with Rock Rock Rock getting reduced to Pebbles Pebbles Pebbles.

But lo, dark forces are afoot. How dark? So dark they actually call themselves dark, as in Dark Elves. Lead by Malekith (Christopher Eccleston), they seek to find the aether, an effervescent weapon capable to returning the entire universe back to darkness, the way it was before the big bang (I guess). Problem is, the aether has bubbled into Jane Foster (Natalie Portman), Thor’s human girlfriend back on Earth. This leads to a reunion and a free trip to Asgard for her, where she gets the stink-eye from Lady Sif (Jaimie Alexander) and nothing but a “worthless mortal” routine from Odin (Anthony Hopkins).

I wish I was joking.

Writing this makes it all sound worse than it actually is, but it’s not really all that good or great. It all looks wonderful, and Hemsworth does a fine job as Thor. The film leaps to new heights when he’s forced to ally himself with his kinda-sorta-in-a-way-not-really brother, Loki (Tom Hiddleston). Hiddleston is simply note perfect as Loki, perfect in the way that Robert Downey Jr. is perfect as Tony Stark/Iron Man. Perfect in the way that bacon perfects any breakfast, lunch, or dinner.

Once we’re into the bromance between Thor and Loki, the film is the better for it and everyone should indeed kneel before Hiddleston and give much thanks.

There’s much running around, destruction of epic proportions, and some humor that is all wrong but other bits that are touches of perfection. Humor that is all wrong is how Erik Selvig (Stellan Skarsgard) is treated in this film, as nothing more than a buffoon. The character, and actor, deserve better.

The better comedic relief comes from Darcy Lewis (Kat Dennings); she’s perfect. It would be real easy for her to become annoying, but she strives mightily not to be so. Watching her torture Ian, her intern, is pretty priceless. And watching her point and say, “It’s meow meow” as Thor’s hammer, Mjolnir, whizzes by is hilarious. And speaking of Meow Meow, Mjolnir gives one of the film’s best performance. No, seriously, it’s hilarious and perfect and makes an otherwise tedious climatic battle a great deal more fun than it might otherwise have been.

Maybe that’s my problem with the film, the level of destruction and its sheer repetition. It’s now become the norm that the villains in superhero films must, at a minimum, be intent on destroying the entire damn planet. Here, they want to destroy the entire damnitall universe. Why? Much like why people climb mountains, villains want to destroy the universe Just Because It’s There.

So in The Avengers, New York is thrashed. In Man of Steel, Metropolis is thrashed. In Thor: The Dark World, all sorts of British things are thrashed, worlds are ravaged, and even Asgard takes a licking (yet keeps on ticking), with the ultimate goal being the annihilation of everything everywhere. It felt boring, something the apocalypse should never feel like.

In the Marvel film universe, where else is there to go? Will each successive film find a new threat to all of existence, that only our merry band, either singly or together, can prevent? It’s like car chases. At first, with a few, they were thrilling (see Bullitt, The French Connection, and The Seven-Ups), but then they just became repetitive (see all others).

Is this the fate of the superhero genre? Do you have to threaten existence itself in order to generate any excitement, or the need for such heroic firepower?

If Thor: The Dark World is any indication, that might be the case and it’s already getting boring. Is it a spoiler to mention that the teaser presented during the closing credits hints that this is the case? (And, by the way, I agree with director Alan Taylor that this little teaser just looks all kinds of horrible; it is jarringly terrible compared to the rest of the film.)

For me, The Avengers was a fun film that doesn’t hold up all that well. T:TDW hints that it’s only going to get worse. Too bad, because the genre has more to offer than variations of Armageddon (see all Marvel films prior to The Avengers). Even the notion of a Norse god dating a human woman has possibilities, as set up in Thor and which this film pretty much ignores to its detriment except for the few times when it’s convenient for the plot.

I hope I’m wrong, because I like most of what they’ve done with Thor, his relationship with “mortals,” and especially his dynamic with Loki. More of that and less apocalypse would be great.

Alas, I’m not holding my breath.

Comments

Wilma Meier said…
Yeah, yeah, yeah...tell us what you really thought of the movie Bob! (LOL)

Wilma (at wilwes dot com)
March 5, 2014 at 2:28 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Not the Hero We Deserve, But the Hero We Need

The Dark Knight is the best film I’ve seen in years. Not just the best “superhero” film, but the best film of any type. It’s not perfect, not quite a masterpiece, but it’s flaws are, to me, tiny and overwhelmed by the time the film ends. While relatively bloodless, it is consistently brutal, not just in what it depicts but in the themes that drive it. TDK is a film for adults, please leave the kids at home. Let’s deal with those “flaws” first, the largest being the character Rachel Dawes . In Batman Begins , I blamed Katie Holmes . Her acting was weak, to say the least, which is regrettable in that who she is and what she says and does are important to the film. Critics agreed and either for that or other reasons, Katie was replaced by Maggie Gyllenhaal , who is a better actress. Yet here she’s weak, real weak. Maybe it’s the character, not the actress, which is frustrating because Rachel is a pivotal character. The film,...
1 comment
Read more

DVD: The Day the Earth Stood Still (2008)

Awful. The film is an environmentalist wacko wet dream. No one else could like this thing. I’m trying to think of something positive and all I can come up with is how positively awful it is. The original The Day the Earth Stood Still is a science fiction masterpiece. In it, Klaatu comes to Earth with a simple message: Do what you want among yourselves and on your planet. But if you attempt to export your violent way to the stars, Gort and his friends will hit you with so many lefts you’ll beg for a right. (Gort being the cosmic version of Chuck Norris, you see.) The ultimate warning was that we needed to change our violent ways if we expected to be accepted among the stars. In this remake, the aliens are environmental busy-bodies who have bought into the entire notion that we puny little humans are capable of destroying the planet. Therefore, we must be eliminated so that the planet, for God knows what reason, can try again. To count the ways in which this film makes no sense ...
1 comment
Read more

I (Briefly) Try a Mac

 I Bought a Mac. My first computer was an Atari 800, fully loaded with 48k of RAM. And I mean the original, beige model, not its low-slung, fancy successor. My friend went for an Apple IIe, which cost a relative fortune. Eventually, I’d step up to an Atari 1040ST, while he’d get a IIgs. And even more eventually, we both ended up with IBM PC compatibles. MSDOS was my friend, Unix an ally. It was with great reluctance that I transition from a command-line interface (CLI) to a Graphic User Interface (GUI), always on a PC platform and never a Mac. I never bought into the hype and never experienced all the horrid things that allegedly befell anyone using a PC. For me, they just worked. Yet here I am, these many decades later, typing this on a brand-new MacBook Air M4. How things change... Initially, there was little regret but a mounting list of frustrations. Adjusting to the keyboard isn’t too hard, it’s just a matter of experimentation. Learning how to scale the display wasn’t awful, ...
Post a Comment
Read more