Skip to main content

The Horror of the First Amendment

Reactions often speak louder than actions, and no where is this more evident than in the reaction to Chick-fil-A's owners actually saying they believe what they believe. I'm not talking about gay rights groups stating their outrage (though the false equation that says "anti-same sex marriage = anti-gay" is getting boring), nor am I talking about planned boycotts (which are silly) and protests (which will be intentionally silly).

No, I'm talking of the mayors of major US cities deciding that the power of government can be welded to tell citizens to sit down and shut up. That these, er, gentlemen consider themselves liberals is just insulting. That civil liberty groups aren't outraged is sad.

If you agree with these mayors it's probably because you agree with what they're saying, but please try and look beyond that. If you grant these people the power to actually do what they're saying, you are granting government that power. One day, there will be someone in office who will decide that what you're saying or doing is bad, and will use this very same power against you.

And then you'll squeal, but it's too late, you gave them the authority.

The grossest example of this was the internment of US citizens during World War 2, simply because they were of Japanese descent. The assumption is this internment was unconstitutional, but the reality is that the US Supreme Court found otherwise in Korematsu v. United States. While the decision has been criticized, it has not been overturned and therefore remains a valid legal precedent.

As Justice Robert Jackson noted in his dissent:

The principle then lies about like a loaded weapon, ready for the hand of any authority that can bring forward a plausible claim of an urgent need. Every repetition embeds that principle more deeply in our law and thinking and expands it to new purposes.
Protest Chick-fil-A all you want, but you should be worried when government decides to act against anyone's free speech.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Not the Hero We Deserve, But the Hero We Need

The Dark Knight is the best film I’ve seen in years. Not just the best “superhero” film, but the best film of any type. It’s not perfect, not quite a masterpiece, but it’s flaws are, to me, tiny and overwhelmed by the time the film ends. While relatively bloodless, it is consistently brutal, not just in what it depicts but in the themes that drive it. TDK is a film for adults, please leave the kids at home. Let’s deal with those “flaws” first, the largest being the character Rachel Dawes . In Batman Begins , I blamed Katie Holmes . Her acting was weak, to say the least, which is regrettable in that who she is and what she says and does are important to the film. Critics agreed and either for that or other reasons, Katie was replaced by Maggie Gyllenhaal , who is a better actress. Yet here she’s weak, real weak. Maybe it’s the character, not the actress, which is frustrating because Rachel is a pivotal character. The film,...

DVD: The Day the Earth Stood Still (2008)

Awful. The film is an environmentalist wacko wet dream. No one else could like this thing. I’m trying to think of something positive and all I can come up with is how positively awful it is. The original The Day the Earth Stood Still is a science fiction masterpiece. In it, Klaatu comes to Earth with a simple message: Do what you want among yourselves and on your planet. But if you attempt to export your violent way to the stars, Gort and his friends will hit you with so many lefts you’ll beg for a right. (Gort being the cosmic version of Chuck Norris, you see.) The ultimate warning was that we needed to change our violent ways if we expected to be accepted among the stars. In this remake, the aliens are environmental busy-bodies who have bought into the entire notion that we puny little humans are capable of destroying the planet. Therefore, we must be eliminated so that the planet, for God knows what reason, can try again. To count the ways in which this film makes no sense ...

I (Briefly) Try a Mac

 I Bought a Mac. My first computer was an Atari 800, fully loaded with 48k of RAM. And I mean the original, beige model, not its low-slung, fancy successor. My friend went for an Apple IIe, which cost a relative fortune. Eventually, I’d step up to an Atari 1040ST, while he’d get a IIgs. And even more eventually, we both ended up with IBM PC compatibles. MSDOS was my friend, Unix an ally. It was with great reluctance that I transition from a command-line interface (CLI) to a Graphic User Interface (GUI), always on a PC platform and never a Mac. I never bought into the hype and never experienced all the horrid things that allegedly befell anyone using a PC. For me, they just worked. Yet here I am, these many decades later, typing this on a brand-new MacBook Air M4. How things change... Initially, there was little regret but a mounting list of frustrations. Adjusting to the keyboard isn’t too hard, it’s just a matter of experimentation. Learning how to scale the display wasn’t awful, ...