Skip to main content

BRD: John Carter

What a stupid title. Yes, that's the name of the main character, but it's not as if it just jumps out and drags you in. John Carter of Mars would have at least identified the series to fans, and the actual first book in the Edgar Rice Burroughs series is "A Princess of Mars." Either title would have been immediately recognizable to the fan base, if to no one else. But just John Carter? Give me a break.

That said, I enjoyed the actual film. Lots of silly fun with at least one seriously poignant moment. Nothing that will bring home an Oscar, but a solid action-adventure frolic once it gets through its opening setup(s).

John Carter tells the story of, er, John Carter, former member of the Army of Northern Virginia fighting for the Confederate States in the Civil War. Carter (Taylor Kitsch) has journeyed to the southwest in search of fortune, never mind the fame. In a cave he encounters a strange being. A brief scuffle ensues, said being is killed, and Carter finds himself on Mars faster than you can say Barsoom. Once there, he becomes embroiled in the planet's politics.

Just so you know, on Baroom (Mars) "politics" generally means, "Let's just us kill all of them!"

The film thrives with setups, maybe too many. The green six-limbed Tharks are in a constant state of war with the red men (though it's more like abundant red tattoos than pigmentation). Between the red men there is constant fighting. There is some race of superbeings who (quite literally) float above it all and for inexplicable reasons like making everyone fight everyone else. And of course there's Dejah Thoris (Lynn Collings), a princess of Mars, Carter's love interest, forced to marry the ruler of another kingdom to bring peace. Sure. The first book is much more straight-forward than this; where did all this hullabaloo come from?

Nonetheless, for the most part, director Andrew Stanton juggles this collection of cliche with skill and even a sense of style. This marks Stanton's debut as a live action director, his previous films having been animated Pixar adventures. For the most part he's very straight forward. Characters and situations are pretty much exactly as presented, no surprises, no sudden twists.

Which is fine by me. This is an action-adventure film set on Mars, true to the spirit, if not the letter, of Burroughs' writings.

It's not perfect, far from it. For instance, it would have been nice if Barsoom had looked like another planet and not the locale where John Ford filmed all his westerns. So many times I expected John Wayne to ride up, Ward Bond in tow, and say, "Follow me, pilgrim."

Then again, the film often plays like a sprawling, classic western, albeit one smashed together with a swords and sandals epic.

When alien looking stuff does appear, it's all gorgeous. The soaring towers of Helium? Awesome. The flying craft of the red men? Fantastic. Woola, the "dog" ordered to protect Carter? I want one! And the Tharks... Dear Lord, the Tharks. They're not exactly as I imagined them while reading the books, but in so many ways they're better. When an army of them opened fire with their incredible rifles, I might have actually squee'd.

Everyone does a reasonable job of acting. No one is particularly wonderful, but neither is anyone even remotely not good. There is at least one stand out moment, though, which starts as yet another cliche and then Stanton turns it into something else, something amazing. On the Blu-Ray the chapter is titled "A Change of Heart," which is also the name of the music queue from composer Michael Giacchino. I don't want to spoil what it is, but that's where you'll find it. Don't just skip to that chapter, either. Watch the film and earn the moment.

In the end, just because everyone is playing to a script you've seen a hundred times or more doesn't mean it's not fun. The cinematography is solid, not a shaky cam in sight. Actions scenes are well done, making it easy to follow along.

John Carter deserved a broader audience than it found. The horrible title and the tepid marketing are largely to blame. The film itself, as with all of Stanton's work, has a very human heart at its core, one designed to bring a smile to your face at the end and maybe even a little lump to your throat.


Popular posts from this blog

Not the Hero We Deserve, But the Hero We Need

The Dark Knight is the best film I’ve seen in years. Not just the best “superhero” film, but the best film of any type. It’s not perfect, not quite a masterpiece, but it’s flaws are, to me, tiny and overwhelmed by the time the film ends. While relatively bloodless, it is consistently brutal, not just in what it depicts but in the themes that drive it. TDK is a film for adults, please leave the kids at home.Let’s deal with those “flaws” first, the largest being the character Rachel Dawes. In Batman Begins, I blamed Katie Holmes. Her acting was weak, to say the least, which is regrettable in that who she is and what she says and does are important to the film. Critics agreed and either for that or other reasons, Katie was replaced by Maggie Gyllenhaal, who is a better actress. Yet here she’s weak, real weak. Maybe it’s the character, not the actress, which is frustrating because Rachel is a pivotal character. The film, at almost two and a half hours, might be a shade long. Having said t…

Rogue One: A Star Wars Story

With its release on home video, we come to the unsurprising and yet still bitter disappointment that is Rogue One: A Star Wars Story. Unsurprising, because of a lousy director. Disappointing, because it should have been great. To explain further will involve light spoilers; I will avoid larger giveaways. In a galaxy far, far away, the Empire continues to consolidate its power after the fall of the Republic (see Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith). Toward that end, they are assembling a giant battle station, the Death Star. The Rebel Alliance plots a way of finding out what’s going on and perhaps, in the process, save their collective butts. Rebellious galivanting ensues. All of the elements necessary to craft a good story are here, yet none of them work. The blame lies almost exclusively at the feet of director Gareth Edwards. This is his third film (after Monsters and Godzilla) and his failings as a director stand out in each. The major problems with each film involve the peopl…

Conspiracy (2001)

The Holocaust remains an unfathomable atrocity, the unholy benchmark by which all such are measured. Stalin and Mao both make Hitler look like an amateur when it came to sheer body count, yet the Holocaust remains unique. It seems to boil down to two reasons. First, the Nazis were terrifying in their systematic approach to the slaughter of Jews, driven by their ideological belief that they were acting for the greater good of all mankind. And second, they hunted Jews in any land they conquered; the goal wasn't merely to "purify" Germany, but the world. Few films have captured these points as well as HBO's 2001 film, Conspiracy. On January 20, 1942, a group of senior officials of Nazi Germany met at a lovely house in the Berlin suburb of Wannsee. The purpose of their meeting was to determine the "final solution" for the Jews. The Wannsee Conference developed what is referred to as the Wannsee Protocol. A single copy of the document remains. Conspiracy, drawi…