Skip to main content

Roman Polanski, your cell is calling….

Look, I’m as conservative as they come. Does that make me right-wing? Fine, have a nice time with the label. But here and now, let’s be clear: Roman Polanski is not a right-left issue. The defense coming from the “art world” in general isn’t an expression of left-wing, or even liberal, values, it’s an expression of depravity.

Am I being too subtle?

Roman Polanski was charged with multiple felonies, all stemming from having sex with a 13-year-old girl. Will you please read that again? 13. The age of consent in California, since the early 1900’s, has been and is 18. Polanski, at the time, was in his 40’s. Any sexual conduct between him and her would be a felony. The age gap aggravates the offense, compounding the possible sentencing. If Polanski had been 18 at the time, it would have been bad enough, but 43…?

Now, add the alcohol and Quaaludes that he introduced into the mix, shake well with both vaginal and anal intercourse, and voila, the crime.

Polanski was charged but reached a plea deal, reducing everything down to a single count of unlawful sex with a minor. When you cop a plea, you have concluded both the trial and conviction phase of the process. All that remains is sentencing, following by possible appeals.

In California, when you enter a plea, the judge very carefully warns you that he is not, by any stretch of the imagination, bound by any promises made by either the prosecution or the defense. He is free to impose what sentence he sees fit for the crime you are pleading guilty to.

This is never shocking news, it’s stated clearly in court when you enter your plea. Your understanding is a requirement for the plea to be accepted by the court. If you say, “Huh, really?” then the plea is null and void and you’re back to getting ready for trial.

Apparently Polanski didn’t like this and he skipped the country.

So let’s review: Plead guilty, was facing sentencing (potentially very stiff), ran away instead. Understand that; Polanski was effectively tried and convicted of unlawful sex with a minor. That’s the result of a plea. That’s not an issue.

If this were anyone else – right, left, white, black, Roman Catholic priest, whatever – there wouldn’t be an issue. Even the French would be screaming, “Hang heeem!” But, zoot alours, he is the great artiste, we must forgive his desire to stick his penis in the anus of little girls.

No. No, we do not.

The basic concept is covered succinctly by Hollywood itself, spoken with concise precision by Baretta (oh so ironically played by Robert Blake): If you can’t do the time, don’t do the crime.

Polanski did the crime, he’s due to do the time. He can now, as he could have done then, appeal any sentence handed down by the court. In California, he could even have been freed on bail pending appeal (unlike Federal court, where you go to prison pending appeal).

Instead, he ran, and he, along with his league of cheerful, amoral apologists, seeks to dictate the terms of his case. Doesn’t work that way. Come into court, Mr. Polanski, and that means, “Welcome back to California!”

(For a reasonably complete history of the case, go here. It tends to give too much credence to a recent documentary, though, so I also recommend this as a counter-point.)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Not the Hero We Deserve, But the Hero We Need

The Dark Knight is the best film I’ve seen in years. Not just the best “superhero” film, but the best film of any type. It’s not perfect, not quite a masterpiece, but it’s flaws are, to me, tiny and overwhelmed by the time the film ends. While relatively bloodless, it is consistently brutal, not just in what it depicts but in the themes that drive it. TDK is a film for adults, please leave the kids at home. Let’s deal with those “flaws” first, the largest being the character Rachel Dawes . In Batman Begins , I blamed Katie Holmes . Her acting was weak, to say the least, which is regrettable in that who she is and what she says and does are important to the film. Critics agreed and either for that or other reasons, Katie was replaced by Maggie Gyllenhaal , who is a better actress. Yet here she’s weak, real weak. Maybe it’s the character, not the actress, which is frustrating because Rachel is a pivotal character. The film,...
1 comment
Read more

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that ...
Post a Comment
Read more

We pause now for a minor rant…

“My car has a flat tire.” “You should buy a new car.” Every time I hear President Obama and other Democrats talking about “health care reform,” that’s what the conversation sounds like. A health care crisis is declared and the only solution is to replace the entire system. At most, around 15% of the American population is without health care insurance. Ignoring the fact that for most of them, this is a matter of choice, it also means that 85% are insured. And of that 85%, something like 70+% like their current coverage and don’t want the government to touch it. So for the vast majority, the current system works and works great. Yet, because of the minority for whom it allegedly does not...toss it all, start again. Admittedly, regardless of insurance coverage, it all costs too much, but again, the only accepted approach to controlling costs are to throw out everything and turn it all over to the government. Tactics that are proposed to address specific cost issues are not consid...
Post a Comment
Read more