Skip to main content

Want to see a horror film? See Eden Lake

But before I get to that, let me say this: I don’t really like horror films. Tonight reminded me why. Christian Toto wrote encouragingly about two: Rogue and Eden Lake. I saw Rogue a couple of weeks ago and held off writing about until I’d seen Eden Lake. Well, that was tonight.

Rogue is one of the best man-versus-seriously-nasty-beast films since, well, Jaws. What’s startling is that very little happens during the first 30 minutes or so, yet I was staring at my screen in rapt attention. It’s damn near a travelogue for the Northern Territory of Australia. It’s mind-bogglingly beautiful, yet somehow, amidst all this light and beauty, in wide open spaces, claustrophobia builds, a sense of dread creeps in, and in a splash, a man disappears and no one know how. He’s just…gone.

Like Bruce the shark, the crocodile in Rogue is within the realm of the possible. What makes the situation horrifying is that the creature’s motivation is simple: Humans have invaded his territory and he will continue to kill until either they are all dead or the survivors have left. What differentiates Rogue from Jaws is that there is no great hunter out to kill the beast. This is not an adventure. This is an attempt to survive. Don’t try and assume who will live and who will die; odds are you’re wrong.

Radha Mitchell is great as the tour guide whose little boat tour goes astray. (As an aside, it was marvelous to finally hear her native Australian accent.) Watching her growing uncertainty as to what’s going on and what to do about us brings us right into the story. Michael Vartan is great as a travel writer who finds himself with much more than a short article about the Northern Territory.

What I really appreciated about the film was the slow sense of dread. Once we find ourselves in the croc’s lair, the slow way it moves about is just perfect. The visual effects are excellent, letting you just marvel at this killing machine as it oh-so-slowly creeps by. Hold your breath, please don’t make a sound, it might get angry.

Then again, I think I’d rather face the croc than Eden Lake. Eden Lake is why I don’t like horror films and that’s because a good horror film is first and foremost horrifying. Slasher flicks like Friday the 13th just aren’t, at least not to me. They’re just body counts.

Eden Lake is the real deal. The setup is simple: Michael Fassbender takes Kelly Reilly to a remote lake in order to propose marriage. It’s meant to be a romantic weekend together but they run afoul of a group of kids. From there, things go very, very wrong.

Did I say “kids”? Yes, with several young enough that in California the courts would presume that they are incapable of committing a crime. And yet…

What results is a taut, smart, nail-biting experience. The film never strays into the absurd. What I appreciated most was the degree to which events were foreshadowed. You can pick up on where things are heading and that only adds to the tension. I watched this with several friends, all of whom started saying, in unison, “Oh no” as everyone realized where things were going.

Which is not to say that the film is predictable, because it’s not. As said, it’s smart, not just smartly done. Writer/Director James Watkins uses subtlety as much as gore to get your attention. Pay attention to little character notes and you’ll be rewarded in the end.

And in the end I was left with a scream, the sort that comes from a film, gets under your skin, into your head, and leaves you…disturbed. This is why I generally don’t like horror films, because when they’re done right you are horrified. That’s exactly what Eden Lake does, and it does so without zombies, masked unstoppable killers, or even buckets and buckets of gore.

If that’s the sort of film you like, I can’t recommend Eden Lake enough. For myself, I’m going to watch some comedies in an attempt to take the edge off.

And get that scream out of my head.

Comments

Anonymous said…
So glad you dug these two as much as I did. The modern horror movie today is in sad shape, but often the best of the bunch are coming from overseas ... and not simply Asia but other countries.

And it's such a nice surprise to see a straight to video flick like "Eden Lake" outscare the movies that get so much attention in theaters (Friday the 13th, My Bloody Val, etc)
February 21, 2009 at 1:28 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Not the Hero We Deserve, But the Hero We Need

The Dark Knight is the best film I’ve seen in years. Not just the best “superhero” film, but the best film of any type. It’s not perfect, not quite a masterpiece, but it’s flaws are, to me, tiny and overwhelmed by the time the film ends. While relatively bloodless, it is consistently brutal, not just in what it depicts but in the themes that drive it. TDK is a film for adults, please leave the kids at home. Let’s deal with those “flaws” first, the largest being the character Rachel Dawes . In Batman Begins , I blamed Katie Holmes . Her acting was weak, to say the least, which is regrettable in that who she is and what she says and does are important to the film. Critics agreed and either for that or other reasons, Katie was replaced by Maggie Gyllenhaal , who is a better actress. Yet here she’s weak, real weak. Maybe it’s the character, not the actress, which is frustrating because Rachel is a pivotal character. The film,...
1 comment
Read more

Dune Part 2 (2024)

I have come not to praise Dune but to bury it. I am in a distinct minority. So be it. To explain why, there will be some minor spoilers ahead; sorry. The short version is #NotMyDune. Summary: Picking up where Dune Part 1 left off, we find the young Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet) hanging out with the Fremen. Plots to overthrow rival houses and empires ensue. Go here to see what I thought about Dune Part 1 (2021) . Overall, I found it to be technically brilliant, but lacking a human heart, an exercise in frenetic slow motion. D2 is more of the same, though with far more action. Acting-wise, everyone is doing a fine, more than adequate job. Absolutely no one or nothing stands out. The way the characters are written (adapted, actually), their back and forths and interactions, are all weak and unengaging. I generally hate when they speak. I've read the novel a ridiculous number of times, and these films are prompting me to read it again. I understand that trying to translate the n...
1 comment
Read more