Skip to main content

A modest proposal: Invade!

I have a modest proposal regarding "comprehensive immigration reform". The answer to approximately 60% of the illegal immigration problem is clear. I'm not quite sure how to clean up the remaining 40%, but the majority, that 60%, can be handled simply by invading Mexico. The 31 separate Mexican states would then be incorporated into the existing 50, making for 81 United States of America. (The next logical step would then be to take over Canada, forming the United States of North America, but that's for another day.)

Let's face facts. Illegals come swarming up out of Mexico because of corruption, crime, and unemployment within Mexico. They come here for work which they can't find there, and in general they don't get shot for talking back to their supervisor. They work within a pseudo-hidden economy that is kept from view because "pro immigration" groups like it that way. These speakers for the little guy co-opt opponents of illegal immigration, like the late Caesar Chavez, in an effort to divert our attention from their own profiteering.

Corruption within Mexico reaches its tentacles into the United States. Illegals come here, get ensnared into working for slave wages, and in turn send over half of their earnings back to Mexico. Thus, billions of dollars are pumped into a dysfunctional Mexican economy to give it the illusion of "thriving". In order to keep this revenue flow intact, "pro immigration" tools fight all attempts to assimilate these workers into US society.

All this and more is solved if we point our military south, smile in that grand tradition of Teddy Roosevelt, and shout, "Charge!" We can even claim self-defense and retaliation because it's clear that they've already invaded us. Hola, Generalissimo, meet the A-10 Warthog!

Several immediate benefits come to mind. Mexicans will be introduced to what history reveals is the true engine of liberty and freedom, personal property rights. The few families that currently hold sway over all Mexican land will find themselves expunged. New land grants will be opened and history shows that as more and more people get to own the land they work, more and more people will discover freedom.

Ah, capitalism in all its glory.

Each of the 31 former Mexican states will establish their own, new state constitutions, and via incorporation their citizens will enjoy the benefits derived from the US Constitution's Bill of Rights. From such humble beginnings, the rule of law will sweep the land. Certainly some corruption will continue -- we're talking humans here, so perfection is an impossibility -- but for 90+% this will be a new age of liberty, freedom, and personal opportunity.

The existing 50 United States will benefit in ways too numerous to count. First, all of those Mexican illegals will, duh, become legal US citizens. They will immediately be entitled to at least the minimum wage. All those employers who heretofore kept the illegal employment secret...well, oopsee for them. All the authority and power of law enforcement can now descend on their sweat shops and the horrific "living" conditions they foist upon these workers. Turning a willfully blind eye and withholding enforcement will no longer be an option.

Next, the country as a whole will reap the benefit of acquiring the rights and assets of a standing member of OPEC. That's right, Mexico is an oil exporting country! Oh, sure, the various environmental moonbats will attempt to choke off this source of oil, much as they've choked off access to existing US oil supplies, but in the meanwhile we'll all reap the benefit of this oil supply. And speaking of those moonbats, we'll be doing them a favor because we can choke off (no pun intended) all those gross polluters that the current, corrupt Mexican government endorses.

The benefits go on and on. Did I even mention tequila? We'd finally have an adult beverage to bitch slap the world with, especially France. Keep your foo-foo champagne, Frenchie, we've got the holy agave plant!

One more benefit: Much of this country would learn a new and proper way to cook. Food is allowed to have character, people, and while I often can't stand the heat, the heavenly glory of chicken mole must be allowed to sweep the land. Ladies and gentlemen, spices are your friend. Fusing this with existing American barbeque will establish a new, possibly dominant world cuisine. Again, take that, ya lousy French chef, you and your cheesy sauces!

We would then only have to deal with the illegal immigration issue that Mexico is currently dealing with. Namely, all those illegals flooding up across Mexico's southern border the southern state borders of Chiapas, Tabasco, Campeche, and Quintana Roo. But, hey, we've got some experience with that problem, and it's a much smaller border.

This, my friends, is truly comprehensive immigration reform.

Comments

Anonymous said…
RIGHT ON!!!

Popular posts from this blog

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

Wow, it’s been over a year. What a way to get back to this blog because… Are the films of the MCU getting worse? It’s a serious question because the latest that I’ve seen, Thor: Love and Thunder and Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania , are strong arguments that the answer is “yes.” Summary: Ant-Man & Ant-Family get sucked into the quantum realm, where skullduggery is afoot. A load of crap ensues. I’m an Ant-Man fan. I loved the first film despite its flaws. It would have been wonderful to see what Edgar Wright may have wrought. It was clear, though, that replacement director Peyton Reed kept some of Wright’s ideas alive. The result was one of the MCU’s most intimate films, a straight-forward tale of a Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) desperate to remain in his daughter’s life while being “gifted” the life of a superhero. Ant-Man and the Wasp sorta stayed that course, but naturally, because this is the modern MCU, we had to have a female superhero take over, the titular Wasp (Hope van Dyne,

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that

Rogan

The entire Joe Rogan controversy is an example of the kids being left in charge and the adults refusing to teach them any better. I’m not a regular consumer of podcasts. There are a couple I listen to from time to time, but nothing on a regular basis. While I’ve caught a few minutes of the Joe Rogan Experience on YouTube, I’ve never listened to his podcast. One of the primary reasons for that is that you have to subscribe to Spotify to do so, and I prefer Qobuz, Tidal, or even Amazon Music. Rogan is behind Spotify’s paywall and that’s that. But the nature of the fight is about more than who does or does not listen to Rogan. This fight goes to the very nature of the First Amendment and the fundamental concept of the United States. And yes, I understand that cuts both ways. What’s his name and Joni Mitchell are free to yank their creations from Spotify, no ifs, ands, or buts. I’m not denying their right, I’m questioning their reasons. Rogan talks to people. He does so largely unfiltered.