Skip to main content

Microsoft Office 2007

Thwack!

I started with that word because, to my amusement, the spellchecker in Microsoft Word 2007 says I spelled it correctly. How many word processors or spellcheckers are you aware of that can spell "thwack"?

Games aside, and I haven't been playing much of them lately, I justify owning a computer by writing. Just because it's been 20 years since I sold anything doesn't deny me the claim. So I'm always looking at what the latest writing software is like.

When I leapt from my Smith-Corona to computers, I used an Atari running LJK Letter Perfect. Not a hint of WYSIWYG in that program, but it was fast, pretty easy, and the standard for real Atari-based writing. When I dabbled with Apples, I discovered WordPerfect, and when I migrated to MS-DOS machines, WP was there waiting.

At the same time, though, dark forces hovered in the shadows, softly whispering a dreaded curse word. That word being, uh, "Word."

I have long hated Word. It has taken me years to get used to its idea of "styles" and, more often than not, they still trip me up. I've never enjoyed the interface and I despise not being able to really see what format codes are being applied (its "reveal codes" feature is a joke). Yes, I understand that WP is based on a much older model for document formatting, that Word is more "modern", but when it comes to creative writing, that older model is perfect, and also explains why lots of creative writers continue to use WordStar. (A program that once threatened to drive me insane; who in Hades invents those keystroke combinations?)

To remain current, though, I've always updated Word and WP. I've had a copy of Word via the Office Suite since Office 95. Of late, I just buy the Student & Teacher edition because I'm a student, damnit. (Honest. I can show you my student ID.) That version is fine because I really only need Word and Excel.

Now, along comes WP X3 and Office 2007. Sigh. Goodbye WP. All things must end, and my romance with you has hit its dead-end. There are three reasons.

First, WP X3 is bug-ridden. At least for me. You may have a stable version and a stable install. I don't. Ugh. And it adds little to nothing over WP v.12, except for being a little big prettier.

Second, Word 2007 opens WordPerfect files almost perfectly. Good enough that I can work on the formatting. This means the megabytes of existing files I've got are easily accessible.

Third, I've installed a copy of OpenOffice which opens both Word and WP documents, thus creating a second back-up for file access. I'm not enamored with OO Writer, though, because it's way too much like pre-2007 renditions of Word and not enough like the stuff I like about WP, so why bother?

Oh, there is ODF, Open Document Format, which would remove my paranoia about any future inability to open documents. And I'm all for that. So this is tempting, but hark, I read that Word 2007, via an add-on, will support ODF.

So what is it about Word 2007?

It's clean. It's that simple. Well, that and the document map, which works now. At least well enough for me.

The reviews for the Office 2007 products -- at least of the beta versions -- have focused on the change from traditional menus to "ribbons". This is a massive change, and actually something I don't like too much. Trying to find an old menu choice via these ribbons is a regal pain in the rump. Fortunately for me, I'm one of those that happily only uses 10% of the software's capabilities, so I can find what I need relatively quickly and just won't worry about the rest.

The neat thing, though, is I shift can into draft view, hide the ruler, and hide the damn ribbons. What I'm left with is stark and minimal, a bare set of icons (that I can customize) and a thin row of menu choices. The result is a screen that visually gets out of my way. I've tried coming close with past versions of Word and WP, but this is close to perfect.

Bonus: Along the bottom I have a status display that gives page count, what page I'm on, line number, and a running word count. Plus a simple bar for adjusting the zoom, or changing view modes (e.g., from draft to page). I am frankly staggered by how clean this all looks.

As for document map, I started playing with it in the beta version of Word 2007, and even then it was better than what I saw in previous renditions of Word. In my copy of Word 2003, for instance, the text in the document map was too small, impossible to read unless I blew everything up full screen. Which I hate. And yes, I'm picky.

For my latest novel, I built an outline with chapter headings and key events that would happen in a given chapter. I flag those as level 1 or level 2 within the outline. In Word 2007 I select "view document map" and that outline appears in a vertical bar to the left. Voila, I can jump anywhere in my document I want with a single click. It is, as advertised, a map of my document.

As I finish a chapter I remove the little event notes and the outline collapses to just the chapter heading. Perfect! Alternately, I can flag key paragraphs for later reference, revision, edits, or just to make it easier to find a key scene.

So I'm hooked. MS has me, again, as a customer when this thing ships the end of this month. And the Teacher & Student is now simply the Home version. And I have a home. And that student ID card.

Oh, and as for that file format thing, for the near future I'll just use the "old fashioned" .doc format which my other versions of Word can open, that my copies of WP can open, and especially what OO Writer can open. That will suit me fine until the Word 2007 .odt utility comes along. Simple!

Never thought I'd be enthusiastic about Word, though. Will wonders never cease?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

Wow, it’s been over a year. What a way to get back to this blog because… Are the films of the MCU getting worse? It’s a serious question because the latest that I’ve seen, Thor: Love and Thunder and Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania , are strong arguments that the answer is “yes.” Summary: Ant-Man & Ant-Family get sucked into the quantum realm, where skullduggery is afoot. A load of crap ensues. I’m an Ant-Man fan. I loved the first film despite its flaws. It would have been wonderful to see what Edgar Wright may have wrought. It was clear, though, that replacement director Peyton Reed kept some of Wright’s ideas alive. The result was one of the MCU’s most intimate films, a straight-forward tale of a Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) desperate to remain in his daughter’s life while being “gifted” the life of a superhero. Ant-Man and the Wasp sorta stayed that course, but naturally, because this is the modern MCU, we had to have a female superhero take over, the titular Wasp (Hope van Dyne,

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that

Rogan

The entire Joe Rogan controversy is an example of the kids being left in charge and the adults refusing to teach them any better. I’m not a regular consumer of podcasts. There are a couple I listen to from time to time, but nothing on a regular basis. While I’ve caught a few minutes of the Joe Rogan Experience on YouTube, I’ve never listened to his podcast. One of the primary reasons for that is that you have to subscribe to Spotify to do so, and I prefer Qobuz, Tidal, or even Amazon Music. Rogan is behind Spotify’s paywall and that’s that. But the nature of the fight is about more than who does or does not listen to Rogan. This fight goes to the very nature of the First Amendment and the fundamental concept of the United States. And yes, I understand that cuts both ways. What’s his name and Joni Mitchell are free to yank their creations from Spotify, no ifs, ands, or buts. I’m not denying their right, I’m questioning their reasons. Rogan talks to people. He does so largely unfiltered.