Skip to main content

John Wick (Amazon Instant Video)

I am seldom, if ever, kind to Keanu Reeves. I have often described him as a human two-by-four, an actor who defines "stiff," etc. If someone's performance is really bad, it's not unusual for me to say he makes Reeves look Oscar-worthy. I am not kind.

Yet, it is equally true that Reeves has a certain range and ability that serves him well in many roles. For example, he's utterly perfect as Neo in The Matrix. And while it was a silly role, he was very good as the pointless white man in 47 Ronin. (I also applaud his documentary Side by Side, chronicling the development of digital cinematography; see it, it's great.)

Now he's in John Wick and he's damn near sublime, as is the entire film. I love a story with a simple plot that is well told, and John Wick is all of that in spades.

Reeves plays the title character. In the opening minutes of the film, we meet Wick, his wife, his wife becoming ill, dying, and leaving Wick a dog as an anchor for his humanity. This sequence, by the by, is very well done. It sets up the character nicely and builds the basic foundation for the rage storm that is to come.

Because some Russian gangster punks, Russian gangsters being the new and acceptable go-to villains for movies, steal Wick's car and kill his dog. This causes, shall we say, a reaction. Because as the Russian gangster punk's Russian gangster father puts it, "It's not what you did, it's who you did it to." Wick is apparently the most lethal killer to have ever walked the face of the earth, probably the reason the dinosaurs went extinct, and with his anchor to humanity gone, he goes on a relentless hunt for Russian gangster punk blood.

There are a number of little scenes where people react to seeing Wick back in action. Each illustrates the sheer size and magnitude of his past and reputation, and they never wear out their welcome. From one man's simple, shocked, "Oh," to another's "Thank you, sir," because Wick opts not to kill him, they are little accents to a remorseless character that Reeves plays to perfection.

The film is a thrill ride from one set piece to the next. Where elsewhere you might describe Reeves' acting as stiff, here it becomes stoic, relentless, remorseless. Others try for this (such as Jai Courtney, a man who ruins everything he's in and will be the singular reason the upcoming Terminator: Genisys will suck); few succeed as well as Reeves. Yes, I am praising Keanu Reeves because the man knows his limits and exploits them to the fullest here.

The entire cast is perfect. No one is going to win an Oscar, because the Oscars don't even acknowledge that films like this exist, but each performance is a fine example of craft. Stand outs for me include Michael Nyqvist, as Russian gangster punk's father, and Ian McShane, operator of The Continental, a hotel where assassins may rest, safe from harm. Adrianne Palicki plays Ms. Perkins, someone who is perhaps disrespectful of The Continental's rules, and she simply revels in the part. (Maybe she would have been a great Wonder Woman after all…)

Special mention goes to that one guy who damn near beats Wick at one point. I believe the character is Kirill, played by Daniel Bernhardt. I hope I got that right because he's awesome.

Chad Stahelski directs and he apparently is a major league stunt coordinator. This shows in virtually every frame of the film. The fight sequences move with verve and splendor. There is a loving embrace of practical effects and it all pays off. The film feels as physical as it looks. Here again Reeves steps up and performs most, if not all, of his own stunt work.

Yes, the plot is a trifle. Yes, there is absolutely nothing of significance going on. You will not be intellectually challenged by anything. But the craft on display here deserves recognition, a simple story told very, very well, by people who care that every detail, even in so trivial a film, is perfect. If you like a good action film, this one is a keeper.

Bravo, Mr. Reeves, bravo.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I (Briefly) Try a Mac

 I Bought a Mac. My first computer was an Atari 800, fully loaded with 48k of RAM. And I mean the original, beige model, not its low-slung, fancy successor. My friend went for an Apple IIe, which cost a relative fortune. Eventually, I’d step up to an Atari 1040ST, while he’d get a IIgs. And even more eventually, we both ended up with IBM PC compatibles. MSDOS was my friend, Unix an ally. It was with great reluctance that I transition from a command-line interface (CLI) to a Graphic User Interface (GUI), always on a PC platform and never a Mac. I never bought into the hype and never experienced all the horrid things that allegedly befell anyone using a PC. For me, they just worked. Yet here I am, these many decades later, typing this on a brand-new MacBook Air M4. How things change... Initially, there was little regret but a mounting list of frustrations. Adjusting to the keyboard isn’t too hard, it’s just a matter of experimentation. Learning how to scale the display wasn’t awful, ...

Dune Part 2 (2024)

I have come not to praise Dune but to bury it. I am in a distinct minority. So be it. To explain why, there will be some minor spoilers ahead; sorry. The short version is #NotMyDune. Summary: Picking up where Dune Part 1 left off, we find the young Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet) hanging out with the Fremen. Plots to overthrow rival houses and empires ensue. Go here to see what I thought about Dune Part 1 (2021) . Overall, I found it to be technically brilliant, but lacking a human heart, an exercise in frenetic slow motion. D2 is more of the same, though with far more action. Acting-wise, everyone is doing a fine, more than adequate job. Absolutely no one or nothing stands out. The way the characters are written (adapted, actually), their back and forths and interactions, are all weak and unengaging. I generally hate when they speak. I've read the novel a ridiculous number of times, and these films are prompting me to read it again. I understand that trying to translate the n...

Rogan

The entire Joe Rogan controversy is an example of the kids being left in charge and the adults refusing to teach them any better. I’m not a regular consumer of podcasts. There are a couple I listen to from time to time, but nothing on a regular basis. While I’ve caught a few minutes of the Joe Rogan Experience on YouTube, I’ve never listened to his podcast. One of the primary reasons for that is that you have to subscribe to Spotify to do so, and I prefer Qobuz, Tidal, or even Amazon Music. Rogan is behind Spotify’s paywall and that’s that. But the nature of the fight is about more than who does or does not listen to Rogan. This fight goes to the very nature of the First Amendment and the fundamental concept of the United States. And yes, I understand that cuts both ways. What’s his name and Joni Mitchell are free to yank their creations from Spotify, no ifs, ands, or buts. I’m not denying their right, I’m questioning their reasons. Rogan talks to people. He does so largely unfiltered....