Skip to main content

Silly no-no's!





California passes bill cutting cars’ carbon dioxide



The California Legislature has handed automakers a major defeat by approving a controversial bill that would make the state the first in the nation to regulate vehicle emissions tied by many scientists to global warming.
Only, humans contribute just 3% of the carbon dioxide in the air. What percentage does California contribute?



Well, let's guesstimate based on the figures at this site, for which I cannot vouch, but since he seems to support this entire effort to reduce carbon dioxide production, he's good to go for this argument.



Unfortunately he uses pretty pictures instead of numbers, the better to show how horrible things are. Looks like the US of A cranks out around 1,350,000,000 metric tons annually, whilst California puffs out 9,500,000. Hmm, get out my calculator here.... So, California produces 0.7% of the US total. The US produces 25% of the world total for carbon dioxide produced by human activity. (See that 3% link above.) That means California contributes 0.175% of the US total, and that's 0.00525% of the total amount of carbon dioxide produced annually (from all sources, man-made and otherwise).



i.e. - Eliminating 100% of California's human activity based carbon dioxide production means precisely dick to the total worldwide production.



This is the victory of symbolism over substance. What are the possible results? Oh, the easiest way for auto manufacturers to meet these requirements is to restrict the types of vehicles they sell in California. There is no emissions control device that can make this happen, so you 1) alter the power source or 2) reduce the per vehicle production. Any of the former are still untenable and the latter is easy; smaller cars, smaller engines, less production.



Which, tada, is the real goal.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Not the Hero We Deserve, But the Hero We Need

The Dark Knight is the best film I’ve seen in years. Not just the best “superhero” film, but the best film of any type. It’s not perfect, not quite a masterpiece, but it’s flaws are, to me, tiny and overwhelmed by the time the film ends. While relatively bloodless, it is consistently brutal, not just in what it depicts but in the themes that drive it. TDK is a film for adults, please leave the kids at home. Let’s deal with those “flaws” first, the largest being the character Rachel Dawes . In Batman Begins , I blamed Katie Holmes . Her acting was weak, to say the least, which is regrettable in that who she is and what she says and does are important to the film. Critics agreed and either for that or other reasons, Katie was replaced by Maggie Gyllenhaal , who is a better actress. Yet here she’s weak, real weak. Maybe it’s the character, not the actress, which is frustrating because Rachel is a pivotal character. The film,...
1 comment
Read more

John Wick: Chapter 4

No sense in playing coy, this is a great film. I’ve seen it twice and while I don’t quite love it in the way I love the first, original John Wick , it’s my #2. It’s a little overlong, has some wasted space and time, has one absolutely pointless and useless character, and generally ignores the realities of firefights, falling, getting shot, hit, etc. All that notwithstanding, it’s a great action flick, has a genuine emotional core, and is well worth your time if you’re into that sort of thing. Like I am. Summary: John Wick (Keanu Reeves), last seen saying he was fed up with the High Table, goes to war to obtain his freedom. Some of the most incredible action scenes ever filmed ensue, culminating in a very satisfactory finale and a devastating post-credit scene. The first Wick film was a surprise hit. It was a simple, straight-forward tale of vengeance told in a simple, straight-forward manner. Where it stood out was its devotion to human stunt work, on exploiting long camera shots that ...
Post a Comment
Read more

DVD: The Day the Earth Stood Still (2008)

Awful. The film is an environmentalist wacko wet dream. No one else could like this thing. I’m trying to think of something positive and all I can come up with is how positively awful it is. The original The Day the Earth Stood Still is a science fiction masterpiece. In it, Klaatu comes to Earth with a simple message: Do what you want among yourselves and on your planet. But if you attempt to export your violent way to the stars, Gort and his friends will hit you with so many lefts you’ll beg for a right. (Gort being the cosmic version of Chuck Norris, you see.) The ultimate warning was that we needed to change our violent ways if we expected to be accepted among the stars. In this remake, the aliens are environmental busy-bodies who have bought into the entire notion that we puny little humans are capable of destroying the planet. Therefore, we must be eliminated so that the planet, for God knows what reason, can try again. To count the ways in which this film makes no sense ...
1 comment
Read more